Cited by 8Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum Information and CryptographyQuantum many-body systems

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Reconstructing unknown quantum states using variational layerwise method

Xiao, Junxiang, Wen, Jingwei, Wei, Shijie, Long, Guilu·2022·Frontiers of Physics

Abstract

In order to gain comprehensive knowledge of an arbitrary unknown quantum state, one feasible way is to reconstruct it, which can be realized by finding a series of quantum operations that can refactor the unitary evolution producing the unknown state. We design an adaptive framework that can reconstruct unknown quantum states at high fidelities, which utilizes SWAP test, parameterized quantum circuits (PQCs) and layerwise learning strategy. We conduct benchmarking on the framework using numerical simulations and reproduce states of up to six qubits at more than 96% overlaps with original states on average using PQCs trained by our framework, revealing its high applicability to quantum systems of different scales theoretically. Moreover, we perform experiments on a five-qubit IBM Quantum hardware to reconstruct random unknown single qubit states, illustrating the practical performance of our framework. For a certain reconstructing fidelity, our method can effectively construct a PQC of suitable length, avoiding barren plateaus of shadow circuits and overuse of quantum resources by deep circuits, which is of much significance when the scale of the target state is large and there is no a priori information on it. This advantage indicates that it can learn credible information of unknown states with limited quantum resources, giving a boost to quantum algorithms based on parameterized circuits on near-term quantum processors.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11467-022-1157-2

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. S. Lloyd, Universal quantum simulators, Science 273(5278), 1073 (1996) · DOI · Paper page
  2. X. Qiang, T. Loke, A. Montanaro, K. Aungskunsiri, X. Zhou, J. L. O’Brien, J. B. Wang, and J. C. F. Matthews, Efficient quantum walk on a quantum processor, Nat. Commun. 7(1), 11511 (2016) · DOI · Paper page
  3. N. N. Zhang, M. J. Tao, W. T. He, X. Y. Chen, X. Y. Kong, F. G. Deng, N. Lambert, and Q. Ai, Efficient quantum simulation of open quantum dynamics at various Hamiltonians and spectral densities, Front. Phys. 16(5), 51501 (2021) · DOI
  4. P. W. Shor, Polynomial-time algorithms for prime factorization and discrete logarithms on a quantum computer, SIAM J. Comput. 26(5), 1484 (1997) · DOI · Paper page
  5. L. K. Grover, Quantum computers can search arbitrarily large databases by a single query, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79(23), 4709 (1997) · DOI · Paper page
  6. G. L. Long, General quantum interference principle and duality computer, Commum. Theor. Phys. 45(5), 825 (2006) · DOI
  7. G. L. Long, Duality quantum computing and duality quantum information processing, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 50(4), 1305 (2011) · DOI
  8. A. W. Harrow, A. Hassidim, and S. Lloyd, Quantum algorithm for linear systems of equations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103(15), 150502 (2009) · DOI · Paper page
  9. C. H. Bennett and G. Brassard, in: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computers, Systems and Signal Processing, 1984, pp 175–179
  10. A. K. Ekert, Quantum cryptography based on Bell’s theorem, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67(6), 661 (1991) · DOI · Paper page
  11. C. H. Bennett, Quantum cryptography using any two nonorthogonal states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68(21), 3121 (1992) · DOI
  12. G. L. Long and X. S. Liu, Theoretically efficient high-capacity quantum-key-distribution scheme, Phys. Rev. A 65(3), 032302 (2002) · DOI
  13. Z. D. Ye, D. Pan, Z. Sun, C. G. Du, L. G. Yin, and G. L. Long, Generic security analysis framework for quantum secure direct communication, Front. Phys. 16(2), 21503 (2021) · DOI
  14. Z. X. Cui, W. Zhong, L. Zhou, and Y. B. Sheng, Measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution with hyper-encoding, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 62(11), 110311 (2019) · DOI
  15. Z. Qi, Y. Li, Y. Huang, J. Feng, Y. Zheng, and X. Chen, A 15-user quantum secure direct communication network, Light Sci. Appl. 10(1), 183 (2021) · DOI
  16. G. L. Long and H. Zhang, Drastic increase of channel capacity in quantum secure direct communication using masking, Sci. Bull. (Beijing) 66(13), 1267 (2021) · DOI
  17. X. Liu, Z. Li, D. Luo, C. Huang, D. Ma, M. Geng, J. Wang, Z. Zhang, and K. Wei, Practical decoy-state quantum secure direct communication, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 64(12), 120311 (2021) · DOI
  18. Y. B. Sheng, L. Zhou, and G. L. Long, One-step quantum secure direct communication, Sci. Bull. (Beijing) 67(4), 367 (2022) · DOI
  19. G. M. D’Ariano, M. D. Laurentis, M. G. A. Paris, A. Porzio, and S. Solimeno, Quantum tomography as a tool for the characterization of optical devices, J. Opt. B 4(3), S127 (2002) · DOI
  20. F. Albarrán-Arriagada, J. C. Retamal, E. Solano, and L. Lamata, Measurement-based adaptation protocol with quantum reinforcement learning, Phys. Rev. A 98(4), 042315 (2018) · DOI
  21. X. Xu, J. Sun, S. Endo, Y. Li, S. C. Benjamin, and X. Yuan, Variational algorithms for linear algebra, arXiv: 1909.03898 [quant-ph] (2019) · arXiv
  22. C. Bravo-Prieto, R. LaRose, M. Cerezo, Y. Subasi, L. Cincio, and P. J. Coles, Variational quantum linear solver, arXiv: 1909.05820 [quant-ph] (2019) · arXiv
  23. X. Wang, Z. Song, and Y. Wang, Variational quantum singular value decomposition, arXiv: 2006.02336 [quant49 ph] (2020) · arXiv
  24. M. Cerezo, K. Sharma, A. Arrasmith, and P. J. Coles, Variational quantum state eigensolver, arXiv: 2004.01372 [quant-ph] (2020) · arXiv
  25. S. McArdle, S. Endo, A. Aspuru-Guzik, S. Benjamin, and X. Yuan, Quantum computational chemistry, arXiv: 1808.10402 [quant-ph] (2018) · arXiv
  26. J. R. McClean, J. Romero, R. Babbush, and A. Aspuru-Guzik, The theory of variational hybrid quantum-classical algorithms, New J. Phys. 18(2), 023023 (2016) · DOI · Paper page
  27. A. Kandala, A. Mezzacapo, K. Temme, M. Takita, M. Brink, J. M. Chow, and J. M. Gambetta, Hardware-efficient variational quantum eigensolver for small molecules and quantum magnets, Nature 549(7671), 242 (2017) · DOI · Paper page
  28. I. G. Ryabinkin, T. C. Yen, S. N. Genin, and A. F. Izmaylov, Qubit coupled cluster method: A systematic approach to quantum chemistry on a quantum computer, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 14(12), 6317 (2018) · DOI · Paper page
  29. I. G. Ryabinkin, R. A. Lang, S. N. Genin, and A. F. Izmaylov, Iterative qubit coupled cluster approach with efficient screening of generators, arXiv: 1906.11192 [quant-ph] (2019) · arXiv
  30. D. B. Zhang, Z. H. Yuan, and T. Yin, Variational quantum eigensolvers by variance minimization, arXiv: 2006.15781 [quant-ph] (2020) · arXiv
  31. E. Farhi and H. Neven, Classification with quantum neural networks on near term processors, arXiv: 1802.06002 [quant-ph] (2018) · arXiv
  32. K. Mitarai, M. Negoro, M. Kitagawa, and K. Fujii, Quantum circuit learning, Phys. Rev. A 98(3), 032309 (2018) · DOI · Paper page
  33. J. Biamonte, P. Wittek, N. Pancotti, P. Rebentrost, N. Wiebe, and S. Lloyd, Quantum machine learning, Nature 549(7671), 195 (2017) · DOI · Paper page
  34. M. Benedetti, E. Lloyd, S. Sack, and M. Fiorentini, Parameterized quantum circuits as machine learning models, Quantum Sci. Technol. 4(4), 043001 (2019) · DOI
  35. S. Wei, Y. Chen, Z. Zhou, and G. Long, A quantum convolutional neural network on NISQ devices, arXiv: 2104.06918 [quant-ph] (2021) · arXiv
  36. F. Hu, B. N. Wang, N. Wang, and C. Wang, Quantum machine learning with D-wave quantum computer, Quantum Engineering 1(2), e12 (2019) · DOI
  37. T. Xin, X. Nie, X. Kong, J. Wen, D. Lu, and J. Li, Quantum pure state tomography via variational hybrid quantum-classical method, Phys. Rev. Appl. 13(2), 024013 (2020) · DOI
  38. J. Xiao, Paulicirq, 2020 · DOI
  39. M. Broughton, G. Verdon, T. McCourt, A. J. Martinez, J. H. Yoo, S. V. Isakov, P. Massey, M. Y. Niu, R. Halavati, E. Peters, M. Leib, A. Skolik, M. Streif, D. V. Dollen, J. R. McClean, S. Boixo, D. Bacon, A. K. Ho, H. Neven, and M. Mohseni, Tensorflow quantum: A software framework for quantum machine learning, arXiv: 2003.02989 [quant-ph] (2020) · arXiv
  40. J. C. Garcia-Escartin and P. Chamorro-Posada, SWAP test and Hong—Ou—Mandel effect are equivalent, Phys. Rev. A 87(5), 052330 (2013) · DOI · Paper page
  41. F. Arute, K. Arya, R. Babbush, D. Bacon, J. C. Bardin, et al., Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor, Nature 574(7779), 505 (2019) · DOI · Paper page
  42. R. E. Plessix, A review of the adjoint-state method for computing the gradient of a functional with geophysical applications, Geophys. J. Int. 167(2), 495 (2006) · DOI
  43. T. Dozat, in: ICLR (2016)
  44. D. P. Kingma and J. Ba, Adam: A method for stochastic optimization, arXiv: 1412.6980 [cs.LG] (2014) · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 8

Metadata

Authors
Xiao, J., Wen, J., Wei, S., & Long, G.
Affiliations
  • State Key Laboratory of Low-Dimensional Quantum Physics (CN)
  • Beijing Academy of Quantum Information Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Wei, Shijie
  • Long, Guilu
Venue
Frontiers of Physics
Published
2022-04-01
Volume
17
Issue
5
ISSN
  • 2095-0462 (ISSN-L)
  • 2095-0470
OpenAlex
W4221107158
Cited by
8
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Frontiers of Physics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
Keywords
quantum state tomography, unknown quantum states, variational quantum circuits, swap test, barren plateaus, variational quantum algorithms, IBM quantum hardware, multi-qubit states

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review