Cited by 432Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum Information and CryptographyQuantum Mechanics and Applications

Quantum Computers Can Search Arbitrarily Large Databases by a Single Query

Open access
Grover, Lov K.·1997·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

This paper shows that a quantum mechanical algorithm that can query information relating to multiple items of the database can search a database for a unique item satisfying a given condition, in a single query [a query is defined as any question to the database to which the database has to return a (yes/no answer]. A classical algorithm will be limited to the information theoretic bound of at least ${log}_{2}N$ queries, which it would achieve by using a binary search.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.79.4709

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A quantum computer can in principle exploit coherent quantum interference and entanglement to perform computations such as factoring large numbers or searching an unsorted database more rapidly than classical computers.

    “In principle, it can exploit coherent quantum interference and entanglement to perform computations, such as factoring large numbers or searching an unsorted database, more rapidly than classical computers 1,2,6-8 .”

    From Experimental realization of a quantum algorithm (1998) · cites this paper as [8]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [Reversible] C. H. Bennett, Space-Time trade-offs in reversible computing, SIAM Journal of Computing, vol. 18, pages 766-776 (1989).
  2. [Feller] W. Feller, An Introduction to Probability Theory & its Applications, Vol. I & II, John Wiley Publishers, 1971.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grover, L. K.
Affiliations
AT&T (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Grover, Lov K.
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
1997-12-08
Volume
79
Issue
23
Pages
4709-4712
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W1993118579
Cited by
432
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 4
FWCI
20.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
Keywords
quantum search, Grover's algorithm, database searching, information-theoretic lower bounds, binary search, quantum algorithms, query complexity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review