Cited by 113Impact of Technology on AdolescentsGambling Behavior and TreatmentsSexuality, Behavior, and Technology

Maladaptive coping styles in adolescents with Internet gaming disorder symptoms

Schneider, Luke A., King, Daniel L., Delfabbro, Paul H.·2018·International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11469-017-9756-9

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Schneider, L. A., King, D. L., & Delfabbro, P. H.
Affiliations
The University of Adelaide (AU)
Corresponding author
King, Daniel L.
Venue
International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction
Published
2017-04-20
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
905-916
ISSN
  • 1557-1874 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-1882
OpenAlex
W2606503997
Cited by
113
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9
FWCI
18.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • 2014 RIBG Small Research Grant
  • Australian Research Council. (Discovery Early Career Researcher Award (DECRA) DE170101198)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
Keywords
internet gaming disorder, adolescents, coping styles, denial, behavioral disengagement, emotion-focused coping, problem-focused coping, gaming time, self-report measures, therapeutic relationship

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review