Cited by 27Criminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisHomelessness and Social IssuesCriminal Justice and Penology

Release from Jail: Moment of Crisis or Window of Opportunity for Female Detainees?

Open access
McLean, Rachel L., Robarge, Jacqueline, Sherman, Susan G.·2006·Journal of Urban Health

Abstract

Despite extensive documentation of the reentry challenges facing female prisoners, few such studies have focused on women exiting jails. The Window Study investigated factors associated with the perceived availability of stable housing upon release from detention. Anonymous surveys were conducted with a random sample (n=148) of female detainees at the Baltimore City Detention Center from January 21 to March 17, 2005. Interviews focused on socio-demographic background, health status, recent drug use and sexual behavior history, and material and social resource availability upon release. The median age of female detainees was 37 (interquartile range [IQR]: 29, 41), 69% were African-American, and 33% identified as lesbian or bisexual. The median income in the 30 days prior to arrest was $145 (IQR: 0, 559), and the median number of prior arrests was 5 (IQR: 3, 11). In the presence of other variables familial support (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR] 2.57; 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.21, 5.47) and a monthly income of $400-799 (AOR 3.18; 95% CI 1.00, 10.07) were positively associated with perceived housing stability upon release; wanting a support group for having traded sex for money, drugs or a place to stay (AOR 0.25; 95% CI 0.10, 0.63) was significantly negatively associated with perceived housing stability upon release. This study suggests the importance of pre-release planning and continuity of care for female detainees. Interventions should emphasize access to housing, economic opportunity and family reunification. Special attention is warranted to those who have engaged in sex work, who may be marginalized from family and service-based support networks.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11524-006-9048-3

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reentry studies of women prisoners generally focus on African American, Hispanic, and White inmates in urban areas rather than on women returning to rural communities with large Hispanic or Native American populations.

    “Reentry studies of women prisoners generally focus on African American, Hispanic, and White inmates in urban areas rather than on women returning to rural communities with large Hispanic or Native American populations (4-6).”

    From Behavioral Health and Social Correlates of Reincarceration Among Hispanic, Native American, and White Rural Women (2013) · cites this paper as [5]

    The Study Design section describes a study of women detained in Baltimore City, and the discussion says the sample was majority African-American. This makes the paper an example of urban reentry research, but it studies jail detainees rather than prisoners and does not establish what reentry studies generally focus on or compare that literature with research on rural Hispanic or Native American communities. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The reentry needs of the participants closely resemble those of urban inmates.

    “Although the reentry needs of our participants closely resemble those of urban inmates (4, 5)”

    From Behavioral Health and Social Correlates of Reincarceration Among Hispanic, Native American, and White Rural Women (2013) · cites this paper as [5]

    The discussion describes reentry needs among female detainees in Baltimore, including housing, income, employment support, and family ties. It supports a comparison with urban female jail detainees, but does not establish that these needs characterize urban inmates generally. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Harrison P, Beck A. Prisoners in 2003. Bureau of Justice Statistics Bulletin. November 2004; NCJ 205335.
  2. Harrison P, Karberg J. Prison and jail inmates at mid-year 2003. Bureau of Justice Statistics Bulletin. May 2004; NCJ 203947.
  3. McLelland G, Teplin L, Abram K, Jacobs N. HIV and AIDS risk behaviors among female jail detainees: implications for public health policy. Am J Public Health. 2002;92:818- 825.
  4. Solomon L, Flynn C, Muck K, Vertefeuille. Prevalence of HIV, syphilis, hepatitis B and hepatitis C among entrants to Maryland correctional facilities. J Urban Health. 2004;81:25-37.
  5. Goswami S. Unlocking options for women: a survey of women at Cook County Jail. Margins. 2002;2:89-114.
  6. Covington S. A woman's journey home: challenges for female offenders and their children. Institute for Relational Development. Paper presented at the National Institutes of Health BFrom Prison to Home^Conference; January 30-31, 2002; Washington, District of Columbia.
  7. Hairston C. Family ties during imprisonment: do they influence future criminal activity? Fed Probat. 1998;52:48-52.
  8. Needle R, Fisher G, Weatherby N, et al. The reliability of self-reported HIV risk behaviors of drug users. Psychol Addict Behav. 1995;9:242-250.
  9. Harrison P, Beck A. Prisoners in 2004. Bureau of Justice Statistics Bulletin. October 2005; NCJ 210677.
  10. Kubiak S. Treatment adherence, drug relapse, and criminal recidivism in a sample of incarcerated men and women. Res Soc Work Pract. 2004;14:424-433.
  11. Hutton H, Treisman G, Hunt W. HIV risk behaviors and their relationship to posttraumatic stress disorder among women prisoners. Psychiatr Serv. 2001;52:508- 513.
  12. Gottfredson M, Hirschi T. A General Theory of Crime. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press; 1990.
  13. Latkin C, Forman V, Knowlton V, et al. Norms, social networks, and HIV-related risk behaviors among urban disadvantaged drug users. Soc Sci Med. 2003;56:465-476.
  14. Dowling-Guyer S, Johnson M, Fisher D, et al. Reliability of drug users' self-reported HIV risk behaviors and validity of self-reported recent drug use. Assessment. 1994;1:383- 392.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McLean, R. L., Robarge, J., & Sherman, S. G.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
McLean, Rachel L.
Venue
Journal of Urban Health
Published
2006-05-04
Volume
83
Issue
3
Pages
382-393
ISSN
  • 0028-7091 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-3460
  • 1468-2869
OpenAlex
W2089335674
Cited by
27
References
2
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
8.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Urban Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Abell Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Homelessness and Social Issues
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
Keywords
women prisoners, jail release, housing stability, reentry, sex work, family support, income, continuity of care, family reunification, drug use, sexual behavior, African American women, lesbian and bisexual women
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Deinstitutionalization, Female, Health Status, Housing, Humans, Prisoners, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk-Taking, Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Baltimore, HIV Infections, Multivariate Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review