Cited by 52Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsICT in Developing CommunitiesHealth Literacy and Information Accessibility

Digital Divide: Variation in Internet and Cellular Phone Use among Women Attending an Urban Sexually Transmitted Infections Clinic

Open access
Samal, Lipika, Hutton, Heidi E., Erbelding, Emily J., Brandon, Elizabeth S., Finkelstein, Joseph, Chander, Geetanjali·2010·Journal of Urban Health

Abstract

We sought to describe: (1) the prevalence of internet, cellular phone, and text message use among women attending an urban sexually transmitted infections (STI) clinic, (2) the acceptability of health advice by each mode of information and communication technology (ICT), and (3) demographic characteristics associated with ICT use. This study is a cross-sectional survey of 200 English-speaking women presenting to a Baltimore City STI clinic with STI complaints. Participants completed a self-administered survey querying ICT use and demographic characteristics. Three separate questions asked about interest in receiving health advice delivered by the three modalities: internet, cellular phone, and text message. We performed logistic regression to examine how demographic factors (age, race, and education) are associated with likelihood of using each modality. The median age of respondents was 27 years; 87% were African American, and 71% had a high school diploma. The rate of any internet use was 80%; 31% reported daily use; 16% reported weekly use; and 32% reported less frequent use. Almost all respondents (93%) reported cellular phone use, and 79% used text messaging. Acceptability of health advice by each of the three modalities was about 60%. In multivariate analysis, higher education and younger age were associated with internet use, text messaging, and cellular phone use. Overall rate of internet use was high, but there was an educational disparity in internet use. Cellular phone use was almost universal in this sample. All three modalities were equally acceptable forms of health communication. Describing baseline ICT access and the acceptability of health advice via ICT, as we have done, is one step toward determining the feasibility of ICT-delivered health interventions in urban populations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11524-009-9415-y

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Among 35 studies, only a few mentioned a theoretical basis or conceptual framework.

    “Among 35 studies, only a few [22-27] mentioned a theoretical basis or conceptual framework that guided their assumptions about why mHealth might facilitate or cause the intended change.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Samal, L., Hutton, H. E., Erbelding, E. J., Brandon, E. S., Finkelstein, J., & Chander, G.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Samal, Lipika
Venue
Journal of Urban Health
Published
2009-11-26
Volume
87
Issue
1
Pages
122-128
ISSN
  • 0028-7091 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-3460
  • 1468-2869
OpenAlex
W1991171817
Cited by
52
References
18
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 13
FWCI
12.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Urban Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (R18HS019313)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL071690, R01HL078579)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › ICT in Developing Communities
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Keywords
digital divide, internet use, mobile phone use, text messaging, sexually transmitted infections, women, health communication, information and communication technologies, educational inequality, urban population, African American women, STI clinic patients
MeSH terms
Adult, Black or African American, Community Health Centers, Cross-Sectional Studies, Educational Status, Female, Health Promotion, Humans, Middle Aged, Patient Education as Topic, Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Urban Population, Baltimore, Logistic Models, Age Distribution, Internet, Information Dissemination, Cell Phone, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review