Exploring Issues About Computational Thinking in Higher Education
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
CT is pedagogically important and useful in teaching and learning activities.
“According to Czerkawski and Lyman (2015), CT is pedagogically important and useful in teaching and learning activities.”
From Incorporating Computational Thinking Into Virtual Laboratories to Enhance Learning Motivation, Engagement, and Higher‐Order Thinking Skills (2025) · cites this paper as Czerkawski and Lyman (2015)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Demystifying computational thinking
Shute, V. J., Sun, C., & Asbell-Clarke, J. (2017) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2017.09.003 · Cited by 1,466 · see citing works
Algorithmic Literacy and the Role for Libraries
Ridley, M., & Pawlick-Potts, D. (2021) · Information Technology and Libraries · doi:10.6017/ital.v40i2.12963 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Wu, T., Sarwono, E., & Huang, Y. (2025) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.70017 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Chapter 1: Problem-based learning: A 21st-century teaching and learning strategy
Research Unit Self-Directed Learning, F. O. E., Golightly, A., Sebatana, M. J., & School of Mathematics, S. A. T. E. (2023) · NWU Self-Directed Learning Series · doi:10.4102/aosis.2023.bk409.01 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Czerkawski, B. C., & Lyman, E. W.
- Affiliations
- University of Arizona (US)
- Venue
- TechTrends
- Published
- 2015-01-28
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 57-65
- ISSN
- 1559-7075 (ISSN-L)
- 8756-3894
- OpenAlex
- W1992394443
- Cited by
- 153
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 8.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- TechTrends (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Teaching and Learning Programming
- Social Sciences › Education › Education and Critical Thinking Development
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Design Education and Practice
- Keywords
- computational thinking, higher education, interdisciplinary relevance, computer science education, STEM education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
