Cited by 7COVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesCOVID-19 diagnosis using AIRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging

Diagnostic performance of Radiological Society of North America structured reporting language for chest computed tomography findings in patients with COVID-19

Open access
Özer, Halil, Kılınçer, Abidin, Uysal, Emine, Yormaz, Burcu, Cebeci, Hakan, Durmaz, Mehmet Sedat, Koplay, Mustafa·2021·Japanese Journal of Radiology

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic performance of the RSNA structured reporting language for chest CT findings in patients with COVID-19.Material and methods Patients with suspected COVID-19 who underwent chest CT and RT-PCR tests were enrolled consecutively in this retrospective study, regardless of symptoms. Imaging findings were categorized as "typical", "indeterminate", "atypical", or "negative" according to RSNA reporting language and compared to RT-PCR. "Single, round GGO" and "single, peripheral GGO," do not fit the reporting language, were also analyzed as "indeterminate" patterns.Results Of the 1186 patients included in the analysis, the diagnosis of COVID-19 was confirmed in 388 patients. Of the 388 patients, CT findings were categorized as "typical" in 248, "indeterminate" in 77, and "negative" in 63. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of "typical" findings were 63.9, 99.0, and 87.5% for COVID-19, respectively. In addition to the "typical" findings, the highest diagnostic accuracy of 92.2% was achieved when the "single, peripheral GGO" and "single, round GGO" were considered to be CT-positive.Conclusion The RSNA reporting language has significant diagnostic performance for identifying COVID-19 pneumonia. CT findings that do not exactly fit the RSNA reporting language, such as "single, round GGO" and "single, peripheral GGO" improve diagnostic performance.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11604-021-01128-2

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The COVID-19 pandemic increased the number of COVID-19-related studies from Japan, with a significant increase in such research focusing on AI.

    “Furthermore, owing to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the number of COVID-19-related studies from Japan has increased [54–61], with a significant increase in such research focusing on AI [62–64].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Özer, H., Kılınçer, A., Uysal, E., Yormaz, B., Cebeci, H., Durmaz, M. S., & Koplay, M.
Affiliations
Selçuk University (TR)
Corresponding author
Özer, Halil
Venue
Japanese Journal of Radiology
Published
2021-05-06
Volume
39
Issue
9
Pages
877-888
ISSN
  • 1867-1071 (ISSN-L)
  • 1867-108X
OpenAlex
W3158174368
Cited by
7
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Japanese Journal of Radiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, chest CT, diagnostic accuracy, ground-glass opacities, RT-PCR validation, COVID-19 pneumonia, indeterminate results
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Humans, Language, Lung, North America, Retrospective Studies, Tomography, X-Ray Computed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review