Cited by 48Diabetes Management and EducationDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsObesity and Health Practices

National prevalence of lifestyle counseling or referral among African-Americans and whites with diabetes

Open access
Peek, Monica E., Tang, Hui, Alexander, G. Caleb, Chin, Marshall H.·2008·Journal of General Internal Medicine

Abstract

Background Modifiable risk factors such as diet and physical activity contribute to racial disparities among patients with diabetes. Despite this, little is known about how frequently physicians provide counseling or referral to address these risk factors, or whether such rates differ by patient race.Methods We analyzed cross-sectional data from the 2002-2004 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey and the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. We used logistic regression to investigate the relationship between counseling/referral for nutrition or exercise and patient factors, provider factors, and geographic location, with a focus on whether counseling rates were independently associated with patient race.Results Overall, counseling/referral for nutrition occurred in 36% of patient visits and counseling/referral for exercise occurred in 18% of patient visits. After adjusting for patient, physician, and practice characteristics, there was no statistically significant association between race and counseling/referral for nutrition (odds ratio for African-Americans compared to whites [OR] 1.00, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.71-1.41) or for exercise (OR 0.74, CI 0.49-1.11). Significant predictors of counseling/referral for both lifestyle interventions included younger patient age, private insurance, and treatment by a primary care provider.Conclusions Rates of lifestyle modification counseling/referral were similarly low among African-Americans and whites in this national study. Our results highlight a need for interventions to enhance physician counseling for patients with diabetes, particularly those at high-risk for diabetes-associated morbidity and mortality, such as racial/ethnic minorities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11606-008-0737-3

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Physicians vary in counseling their patients to exercise: on average, advice or referral related to exercise occurred at 18% of office visits among diabetic patients, and 73% of patients reported receiving advice at some point to exercise more.

    “Physicians vary in counseling their patients to exercise: on average, advice or referral related to exercise occurred at 18% of office visits among diabetic patients ( 213 ), and 73% of patients reported receiving advice at some point to exercise more ( 192 ).”

    From Exercise and Type 2 Diabetes (2010) · cites this paper as [213]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Weinstein A, Feigley P, Pullen P, Mann L, Redman L. Neighborhood safety and the prevalence of physical inactivity-selected states, 1996. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1999;48:143-6.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Peek, M. E., Tang, H., Alexander, G. C., & Chin, M. H.
Affiliations
University of Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Peek, Monica E.
Venue
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Published
2008-08-06
Volume
23
Issue
11
Pages
1858-1864
ISSN
  • 0884-8734 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-1497
OpenAlex
W2049636515
Cited by
48
References
27
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of General Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (K23 DK075006, P60 DK20595, K24 DK071933, K08 HS15699-01A1, K08HS015699)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (K24DK071933, DK071933, K23DK075006, P60DK020595, P30DK092949)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
Keywords
diabetes mellitus, lifestyle counseling, nutrition counseling, exercise referral, racial disparities, African Americans, health disparities, physician counseling, diet, physical activity, primary care, outpatient care
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Black or African American, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diabetes Mellitus, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Outpatients, Referral and Consultation, United States, Prevalence, Odds Ratio, Health Care Surveys, Directive Counseling, Risk Reduction Behavior, White People, Diabetes Complications, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review