Cited by 121Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesPalliative and Oncologic CareEthics and bioethics in healthcare

Using the Experiences of Bereaved Caregivers to Inform Patient- and Caregiver-centered Advance Care Planning

Open access
Fried, Terri R., O’Leary, John R.·2008·Journal of General Internal Medicine

Abstract

Background Traditional approaches to advance care planning (ACP) have many limitations; new approaches are being developed with the goal of improving end-of-life care.Objective To understand how the end-of-life care experiences of older patients and their caregivers can inform the development of new approaches to ACP.Design Qualitative cross-sectional study.Participants Caregivers of community-dwelling persons age > or = 60 years who died with advanced cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or heart failure during follow-up in a longitudinal study.Approach In-depth interviews were conducted 6 months after the patient's death with 64 caregivers. Interviews began with open-ended questions to encourage the caregiver to tell the story of the patient's experiences at the end of life. Additional questions asked about how decisions were made, patient-caregiver, patient-clinician, and caregiver-clinician communication.Main results Although the experiences recounted by caregivers were highly individual, several common themes emerged from the interviews. These included the following: 1) the lack of availability of treatment options for certain patients, prompting patients and caregivers to consider broader end-of-life issues, 2) changes in preferences at the very end of an illness, 3) variability in patient and caregiver desire for and readiness to hear information about the patient's illness, and 4) difficulties with patient-caregiver communication.Discussion The experiences of older patients at the end of life and their caregivers support a form of ACP that includes a broader set of issues than treatment decision-making alone, recognizes the dynamic nature of preferences, and focuses on addressing barriers to patient-caregiver communication.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11606-008-0748-0

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patients and families desire conversations about end-of-life care.

    “Patients and families desire conversations about end-of-life care.46,47”

    From Managing with pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (2013) · cites this paper as [47]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) describes caregivers’ recollections of missed opportunities to communicate with patients about end-of-life care. It also emphasizes varying preferences and says some patients and caregivers did not want prognostic information, so the unqualified claim that patients and families desire such conversations overstates the finding. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fried, T. R., & O’Leary, J. R.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Fried, Terri R.
Venue
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Published
2008-07-30
Volume
23
Issue
10
Pages
1602-1607
ISSN
  • 0884-8734 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-1497
OpenAlex
W1980493544
Cited by
121
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 10
FWCI
7.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of General Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (K24AG028443, R01AG019769, K24 AG28443, R01 AG19769)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Keywords
advance care planning, bereaved caregivers, end-of-life care, older adults, caregiver-patient communication, dynamic preferences, treatment decision-making, advanced cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure, community-dwelling patients, caregiver experiences
MeSH terms
Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Participation, Caregivers, Hospice Care, Advance Care Planning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review