Cited by 93Legal Education and Practice InnovationsInterprofessional Education and CollaborationHealth disparities and outcomes

Medical-Legal Partnership: Collaborating with Lawyers to Identify and Address Health Disparities

Open access
Cohen, Ellen, Fullerton, Danya Fortess, Retkin, Randye, Weintraub, Dana, Tames, Pamela, Brandfield, Julie, Sandel, Megan·2010·Journal of General Internal Medicine

Abstract

Introduction Medical-legal partnerships (MLPs) bring together medical professionals and lawyers to address social causes of health disparities, including access to adequate food, housing and income.Setting Eighty-one MLPs offer legal services for patients whose basic needs are not being met.Program description Besides providing legal help to patients and working on policy advocacy, MLPs educate residents (29 residency programs), health care providers (160 clinics and hospitals) and medical students (25 medical schools) about how social conditions affect health and screening for unmet basic needs, and how these needs can often be impacted by enforcing federal and state laws. These curricula include medical school courses, noon conferences, advocacy electives and CME courses.Program evaluation Four example programs are described in this paper. Established MLPs have changed knowledge (MLP | Boston-97% reported screening for two unmet needs), attitudes (Stanford reported reduced concern about making patients "nervous" with legal questions from 38% to 21%) and behavior (NY LegalHealth reported increasing resident referrals from 15% to 54%) after trainings. One developing MLP found doctors experienced difficulty addressing social issues (NJ LAMP-67% of residents felt uncomfortable).Discussion MLPs train residents, students and other health care providers to tackle socially caused health disparities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11606-009-1239-7

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Fleishman SB, Retkin R, Brandfield J, Braun V. The attorney as the newest member of the cancer treatment team. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24 (13):2123-6.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cohen, E., Fullerton, D. F., Retkin, R., Weintraub, D., Tames, P., Brandfield, J., & Sandel, M.
Affiliations
  • Newark Beth Israel Medical Center (US)
  • Boston Medical Center (US)
  • New York Legal Assistance Group (US)
  • Lucile Packard Children's Hospital (US)
  • Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
Sandel, Megan
Venue
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Published
2010-03-30
Volume
25
Issue
S2
Pages
136-139
ISSN
  • 0884-8734 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-1497
OpenAlex
W2063110506
Cited by
93
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
FWCI
70.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of General Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Healthcare Foundation of New Jersey
  • W.K. Kellogg Foundation
  • California Endowment
  • United Health Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Legal Education and Practice Innovations
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
medical-legal partnerships, health disparities, social determinants of health, basic needs, medical education, residency training, provider attitudes, policy advocacy
MeSH terms
Cooperative Behavior, Humans, Legislation, Medical, Physicians, Program Evaluation, Lawyers, Healthcare Disparities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review