The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Outcomes of Minimal and Moderate Support Versions of an Internet-Based Diabetes Self-Management Support Program
Open accessAbstract
Objective Internet and other interactive technology-based programs offer great potential for practical, effective, and cost-efficient diabetes self-management (DSM) programs capable of reaching large numbers of patients. This study evaluated minimal and moderate support versions of an Internet-based diabetes self-management program, compared to an enhanced usual care condition.Research design and methods A three-arm practical randomized trial was conducted to evaluate minimal contact and moderate contact versions of an Internet-based diabetes self-management program, offered in English and Spanish, compared to enhanced usual care. A heterogeneous sample of 463 type 2 patients was randomized and 82.5% completed a 4-month follow-up. Primary outcomes were behavior changes in healthy eating, physical activity, and medication taking. Secondary outcomes included hemoglobin A1c, body mass index, lipids, and blood pressure.Results The Internet-based intervention produced significantly greater improvements than the enhanced usual care condition on three of four behavioral outcomes (effect sizes [d] for healthy eating = 0.32; fat intake = 0.28; physical activity= 0.19) in both intent-to-treat and complete-cases analyses. These changes did not translate into differential improvements in biological outcomes during the 4-month study period. Added contact did not further enhance outcomes beyond the minimal contact intervention.Conclusions The Internet intervention meets several of the RE-AIM criteria for potential public health impact, including reaching a large number of persons, and being practical, feasible, and engaging for participants, but with mixed effectiveness in improving outcomes, and consistent results across different subgroups. Additional research is needed to evaluate longer-term outcomes, enhance effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, and understand the linkages between intervention processes and outcomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Characteristics of the intervention that may improve adherence to the intervention include a strong theoretical foundation [41], perceived personal relevance to the user [65,66], perceived effectiveness [67,68], tailoring [69,70], persuasive technologies [71], credibility [72,73], social networking [74,75], and regular “push factors” including human support [76-78] and/or periodic prompts (eg, by”
From Web-Based Interventions for Behavior Change and Self-Management: Potential, Pitfalls, and Progress (2012) · cites this paper as [76]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Group based training for self-management strategies in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus
Deakin, T. A., McShane, C. E., Cade, J. E., & Williams, R. (2005) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003417.pub2 · Cited by 862
RetractedSelf-efficacy: The exercise of control
Bandura, A., Freeman, W. H., & Lightsey, R. (1999) · Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1891/0889-8391.13.2.158 · Cited by 46,835
Self-efficacy: the exercise of control
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.35-1826 · Cited by 24,451
Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice
(1992) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-116-4-350_1 · Cited by 13,232
Ecological models of health behavior.
Sallis, J. F., Owen, N. G., & Fisher, E. B. (2008) · Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) · Cited by 3,217
Health behavior and health education
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-2173 · Cited by 2,919
Eysenbach, G. (2005) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.7.1.e11 · Cited by 2,524
Brief questions to identify patients with inadequate health literacy.
Chew, L. D., Bradley, K. A., & Boyko, E. J. (2004) · PubMed · Cited by 1,913
Effectiveness of Self-Management Training in Type 2 Diabetes
Norris, S. L., Engelgau, M. M., & Venkat Narayan, K. M. (2001) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.24.3.561 · Cited by 1,846
Tunis (2003) · doi:10.1001/jama.290.12.1624 · Cited by 1,724
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Thompson FE, Kipnis V, Subar AF, et al. Performance of a short instrument to estimate usual dietary intake of percent calories from fat. Euro J Clin Nutr. 1998;52:S63.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–106 of 106
Garrido, M. E. L., Molina, A. A. S., & Sáez, K. L. (2022) · Revista médica de Chile · doi:10.4067/s0034-98872022000600754
Howland, C. (2022) · MOspace Institutional Repository (University of Missouri) · doi:10.32469/10355/94065
The Importance of Empowering Self-Management Skills in Diabetes Mellitus
Thapa, P. P., Oral, O., & Nomikos, G. N. (2024) · Advanced Medical Research · doi:10.62836/amr.v3i1.182
Wright, A. J., Bushey, E. L., Wu, Y., Johnson, B. T., Kwiatek, K. M., & Pescatello, L. S. (2025) · doi:10.2196/preprints.79659
Craemer, M. D., Kinaupenne, M., Decraene, M., Bogaert, L., & Willems, I. (2026) · medRxiv · doi:10.64898/2026.03.24.26349179 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Glasgow, R. E., Kurz, D., King, D., Dickman, J. M., Faber, A. J., Halterman, E., Wooley, T., Toobert, D. J., Strycker, L. A., Estabrooks, P. A., Osuna, D., & Ritzwoller, D.
- Affiliations
- Kaiser Permanente (US)
- InterVision Media (United States) (US)
- Oregon Research Institute (US)
- Virginia Tech (US)
- Corresponding author
- Glasgow, Russell E.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of General Internal Medicine
- Published
- 2010-08-17
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1315-1322
- ISSN
- 0884-8734 (ISSN-L)
- 1525-1497
- PMC
- PMC2988142
- OpenAlex
- W2032770553
- Cited by
- 106
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 6.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of General Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK035524, R37DK035524, DK 35524)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Keywords
- diabetes self-management, type 2 diabetes, online intervention, usual care, healthy eating, physical activity, medication adherence, HbA1c, blood pressure, lipids, body mass index, Spanish-language intervention, RE-AIM framework, cost-effectiveness
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Self Care, Treatment Outcome, Internet, Risk Reduction Behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
