Cited by 862Diabetes Management and EducationDiabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Treatment and Management

Group based training for self-management strategies in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Deakin, Trudi A, McShane, Catherine E, Cade, Janet E, Williams, Rhys·2005·Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Abstract

Background It has been recognised that adoption of self-management skills by the person with diabetes is necessary in order to manage their diabetes. However, the most effective method for delivering education and teaching self-management skills is unclear. Objectives To assess the effects of group-based, patient-centred training on clinical, lifestyle and psychosocial outcomes in people with type 2 diabetes. Search strategy Studies were obtained from computerised searches of multiple electronic bibliographic databases, supplemented by hand searches of reference lists of articles, conference proceedings and consultation with experts in the field. Date of last search was February 2003. Selection criteria Randomised controlled and controlled clinical trials which evaluated group-based education programmes for adults with type 2 diabetes compared with routine treatment, waiting list control or no intervention. Studies were only included if the length of follow-up was six months or more and the intervention was at least one session with the minimum of six participants. Data collection and analysis Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed study quality. A meta-analysis was performed if there were enough homogeneous studies reporting an outcome at either four to six months, 12-14 months, or two years, otherwise the studies were summarised in a descriptive manner. Main results Fourteen publications describing 11 studies were included involving 1532 participants. The r…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/14651858.cd003417.pub2This paper is marked retracted.

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Deakin, T. A., McShane, C. E., Cade, J. E., & Williams, R.
Affiliations
  • Burnley General Teaching Hospital (GB)
  • University of Leeds (GB)
  • Swansea University (GB)
Venue
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Published
2005-04-20
Issue
2
Pages
CD003417-CD003417
ISSN
1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2108527237
Cited by
862
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 52 · 2017: 63 · 2016: 47 · 2015: 62 · 2014: 71 · 2013: 79 · 2012: 51
Type
reference entry
Language
en
Status
Retracted
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, self-management education, HbA1c, fasting blood glucose, weight loss, diabetes knowledge, psychosocial outcomes, lifestyle intervention, patient-centred education, diabetes self-management education, HbA1c reduction, anxiety, diabetes distress, quality of life
MeSH terms
Adult, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Patient Education as Topic, Self Care, Self-Help Groups, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review