Cited by 440Artificial Intelligence in HealthcareElectronic Health Records SystemsMachine Learning in Healthcare

Bringing Big Data to Personalized Healthcare: A Patient-Centered Framework

Open access
Chawla, Nitesh V., Davis, Darcy A.·2013·Journal of General Internal Medicine

Abstract

Faced with unsustainable costs and enormous amounts of under-utilized data, health care needs more efficient practices, research, and tools to harness the full benefits of personal health and healthcare-related data. Imagine visiting your physician's office with a list of concerns and questions. What if you could walk out the office with a personalized assessment of your health? What if you could have personalized disease management and wellness plan? These are the goals and vision of the work discussed in this paper. The timing is right for such a research direction--given the changes in health care, reimbursement, reform, meaningful use of electronic health care data, and patient-centered outcome mandate. We present the foundations of work that takes a Big Data driven approach towards personalized healthcare, and demonstrate its applicability to patient-centered outcomes, meaningful use, and reducing re-admission rates.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11606-013-2455-8

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chawla, N. V., & Davis, D. A.
Affiliations
University of Notre Dame (US)
Corresponding author
Chawla, Nitesh V.
Venue
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Published
2013-06-25
Volume
28
Issue
S3
Pages
660-665
ISSN
  • 0884-8734 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-1497
OpenAlex
W2167671703
Cited by
440
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 2
FWCI
58.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of General Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
Keywords
big data, personalized healthcare, patient-centered outcomes, meaningful use, electronic health records, hospital readmission prevention, health care costs
MeSH terms
Delivery of Health Care, Humans, Medical Informatics Applications, Patient-Centered Care, Disease Management, Data Mining, Precision Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review