Cited by 14Diabetes Treatment and ManagementHealth disparities and outcomesDiabetes Management and Research

Racial and Ethnic Inequities in Diabetes Pharmacotherapy: Black and Hispanic Patients Are Less Likely to Receive SGLT2is and GLP1as

Open access
Cai, Christopher, Woolhandler, Steffie, McCormick, Danny, Himmelstein, David U., Himmelstein, Jessica, Schrier, Elizabeth, Dickman, Samuel L.·2022·Journal of General Internal Medicine

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11606-022-07428-1

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Black, Hispanic/Latinx, and Asian individuals receive fewer prescriptions for SGLT2i or GLP1ra medications compared to White individuals.

    “Compounding this significant underuse, Black, Hispanic/Latinx, and Asian individuals receive fewer prescriptions for these medications compared to White individuals.14–17”

    From Disparities in Use of Novel Diabetes Medications by Insurance: A Nationally Representative Cohort Study (2024) · cites this paper as [17]

    The Results report lower odds of receiving both SGLT2is and GLP1as for Black and Hispanic individuals compared with White individuals. The Discussion states that sample-size constraints precluded analyses of other racial or ethnic groups, so this paper does not support the claim about Asian individuals. Page numbers are not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.94)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Recent studies have broadly shown racial and ethnic differences in SGLT2i and GLP1ra prescriptions, with Black, Hispanic/Latinx, and Asian groups receiving these medications at lower rates than White individuals.

    “Recent studies have also broadly shown racial and ethnic differences in SGLT2i and GLP1ra prescriptions with Black, Hispanic/Latinx, and Asian groups receiving these medications at lower rates than White individuals.14–17”

    From Disparities in Use of Novel Diabetes Medications by Insurance: A Nationally Representative Cohort Study (2024) · cites this paper as [17]

    The Results report that Black and Hispanic individuals had lower odds than White individuals of receiving both SGLT2is and GLP1as. The Discussion says sample-size constraints precluded analyses of other racial or ethnic groups, so this paper does not support the claim about Asian individuals. (LLM, conf=0.92)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Another potential explanation for why starkly different disparities by insurance type were observed includes structural racism embedded in health systems, and implicit or explicit bias among clinicians that may serve these different populations.

    “Another potential explanation for why we observed starkly different disparities by insurance type includes structural racism embedded in health systems, and implicit or explicit bias among the clinicians that may serve these different populations.17,35–37”

    From Disparities in Use of Novel Diabetes Medications by Insurance: A Nationally Representative Cohort Study (2024) · cites this paper as [17]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) implicates structural racism in racial inequities in diabetes medication use and suggests unequal coverage exacerbates them. It also lists interpersonal racism as a barrier, but does not specifically identify implicit or explicit clinician bias or establish that such bias explains differences by insurance type. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Black patients are significantly less likely than White patients to receive GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT2 inhibitors even when they meet clear clinical criteria.

    “Analyses from large healthcare systems, including the Veterans Health Administration, show that Black patients are significantly less likely than White patients to receive these therapies [13].”

    From Unequal Access to Evidence-Based Cardiometabolic Therapies: Racial Disparities in SGLT2 Inhibitor and GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Use Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease (2026) · cites this paper as [13]

    The Results report significantly lower adjusted odds of receiving both drug classes for Black patients than for White patients. But the Methods describe a nationally representative MEPS survey, not an analysis of a large healthcare system or the Veterans Health Administration. The Discussion also says the study lacked clinical metrics needed to determine whether some medications were contraindicated, so it cannot establish that patients met clear clinical criteria. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Inequities in diabetes management directly contribute to disparities in cardiovascular outcomes.

    “Because type 2 diabetes is tightly linked to atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, particularly coronary artery disease (CAD), inequities in diabetes management directly contribute to disparities in cardiovascular outcomes [13].”

    From Unequal Access to Evidence-Based Cardiometabolic Therapies: Racial Disparities in SGLT2 Inhibitor and GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Use Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease (2026) · cites this paper as [13]

    The Background (page unavailable) says these medications can increase survival in patients with cardiac or renal disease, and the Results (page unavailable) find that Black and Hispanic patients were less likely to receive them. The paper does not assess cardiovascular outcomes or establish that treatment inequities directly cause disparities in those outcomes. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [7]7. Boyd R, Lindo E, Weeks L, McLemore M. On Racism: A new standard for publishing on racial health inequities [Internet]. Health Affairs Blog. 2020. Available from: https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/ hblog20200630.939347/full/

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cai, C., Woolhandler, S., McCormick, D., Himmelstein, D. U., Himmelstein, J., Schrier, E., & Dickman, S. L.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Cambridge Health Alliance (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Planned Parenthood (US)
Corresponding author
Cai, Christopher
Venue
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Published
2022-02-09
Volume
37
Issue
13
Pages
3501-3503
ISSN
  • 0884-8734 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-1497
OpenAlex
W4210913682
Cited by
14
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of General Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
racial disparities, diabetes pharmacotherapy, SGLT2 inhibitors, GLP-1 receptor agonists, Black patients, Hispanic patients, prescription drug use, insulin, metformin, sulfonylureas, DPP-4 inhibitors, heart disease, chronic kidney disease, health insurance, health care utilization
MeSH terms
Black or African American, Diabetes Mellitus, Ethnicity, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, United States, Black People, Racial Groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review