Cited by 4Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic SkillsAlcoholism and Thiamine DeficiencyDiabetes Management and Research

Addressing Cognitive Biases in Interpreting an Elevated Lactate in a Patient with Type 1 Diabetes and Thiamine Deficiency

Open access
Chehayeb, Rachel Jaber, Ilagan-Ying, Ysabel C., Sankey, Christopher·2023·Journal of General Internal Medicine

Abstract

We present the case of a young woman admitted for diabetic ketoacidosis with persistent, asymptomatic lactic acid (LA) elevation during the evolving COVID-19 pandemic. Cognitive biases in interpreting an elevated LA in this patient's care resulted in an extensive infectious workup instead of the low-cost and potentially diagnostic provision of empiric thiamine. We discuss clinical patterns and etiologies of LA elevation and the role of thiamine deficiency. We also address cognitive biases potentially affecting the interpretation of elevated lactate levels and provide guidance for clinicians to determine appropriate patients for empiric thiamine administration.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11606-023-08091-w

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chehayeb, R. J., Ilagan-Ying, Y. C., & Sankey, C.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • Yale New Haven Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Sankey, Christopher
Venue
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Published
2023-02-22
Volume
38
Issue
6
Pages
1547-1551
ISSN
  • 0884-8734 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-1497
OpenAlex
W4321482869
Cited by
4
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 1
FWCI
1.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of General Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Yale University
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001863)
  • Raymond and Beverly Sackler Institute for Biological, Physical and Engineering Sciences, Yale University
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Alcoholism and Thiamine Deficiency
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
hyperlactatemia, thiamine deficiency, type 1 diabetes, diabetic ketoacidosis, cognitive biases, diagnostic decision-making, COVID-19 pandemic, diagnostic workup
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Beriberi, Cognition, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Female, Humans, Thiamine, Thiamine Deficiency, Bias, Lactic Acid, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review