The DOI matches its Crossref record; 98 of the 98 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ecological distribution conflicts as forces for sustainability: an overview and conceptual framework
Open accessAbstract
Can ecological distribution conflicts turn into forces for sustainability? This overview paper addresses in a systematic conceptual manner the question of why, through whom, how, and when conflicts over the use of the environment may take an active role in shaping transitions toward sustainability. It presents a conceptual framework that schematically maps out the linkages between (a) patterns of (unsustainable) social metabolism, (b) the emergence of ecological distribution conflicts, (c) the rise of environmental justice movements, and (d) their potential contributions for sustainability transitions. The ways how these four processes can influence each other are multi-faceted and often not a foretold story. Yet, ecological distribution conflicts can have an important role for sustainability, because they relentlessly bring to light conflicting values over the environment as well as unsustainable resource uses affecting people and the planet. Environmental justice movements, born out of such conflicts, become key actors in politicizing such unsustainable resource uses, but moreover, they take sometimes also radical actions to stop them. By drawing on creative forms of mobilizations and diverse repertoires of action to effectively reduce unsustainabilities, they can turn from 'victims' of environmental injustices into 'warriors' for sustainability. But when will improvements in sustainability be lasting? By looking at the overall dynamics between the four processes, we aim to foster a more systematic understanding of the dynamics and roles of ecological distribution conflicts within sustainability processes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Risk Society, Towards a New Modernity
Leiss, W., Beck, U., Ritter, M., Lash, S., & Wynne, B. (1994) · Canadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers canadiens de sociologie · doi:10.2307/3341155 · Cited by 12,546
Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity
Boyd, W., Beck, U., & Shrader-Frechette, K. S. (1993) · Economic Geography · doi:10.2307/143601 · Cited by 9,215
Great transformation: The political and economic origins of our time
Polanyi, K., Stiglitz, J. E., & Block, F. (1944) · Cited by 6,692
McAdam, D., Tarrow, S., & Tilly, C. (2001) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511805431 · Cited by 5,558
Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics
Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. (2014) · Cornell University Press eBooks · doi:10.7591/9780801471292 · Cited by 4,627
Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects
Markard, J., Raven, R., & Truffer, B. (2012) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013 · Cited by 3,763
Gibson, K. (2006) · Cited by 3,056
Dumping in Dixie: Race, Class, and Environmental Quality.
Hamilton, L. C., & Bullard, R. D. (1991) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2580094 · Cited by 2,335
(2015) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315685366 · Cited by 2,046
Green Grabbing: a new appropriation of nature?
Fairhead, J., Leach, M., & Scoones, I. (2012) · The Journal of Peasant Studies · doi:10.1080/03066150.2012.671770 · Cited by 1,928
Cited by
Environmental conflicts and defenders: A global overview
Scheidel, A., Del Bene, D., Liu, J., Navas, G., Mingorría, S., Demaria, F., Avila, S., Roy, B., Ertör, I., Temper, L., et al. (2020) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102104 · Cited by 522
Self-citationEnvironmental justice and the SDGs: from synergies to gaps and contradictions
Menton, M., Larrea, C., Latorre, S., Martinez-Alier, J., Peck, M., Temper, L., & Walter, M. (2020) · Sustainability Science · doi:10.1007/s11625-020-00789-8 · Cited by 405
Self-citationTemper, L., Avila, S., Bene, D. D., Gobby, J., Kosoy, N., Billon, P. L., Martinez-Alier, J., Perkins, P., Roy, B., Scheidel, A., et al. (2020) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/abc197 · Cited by 320
Self-citationThe political ecologies of "green" extractivism(s): An introduction
Dunlap, A., Verweijen, J., & Tornel, C. (2024) · Journal of Political Ecology · doi:10.2458/jpe.6131 · Cited by 126
“This leads to a research focus on "institutions of societies, which govern modes of appropriation , distribution and disposal of materials and energy" (Scheidel et al. 2018, 587; emphasis added).”
BackgroundConflicting securities: contributions to a critical research agenda on climate security
Lamain, C. (2022) · Globalizations · doi:10.1080/14747731.2022.2057093 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Scheidel, A., Temper, L., Demaria, F., & Martínez-Alier, J.
- Venue
- Sustainability Science
- Published
- 2017-12-13
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 585-598
- ISSN
- 1862-4057 (ISSN-L)
- 1862-4065
- OpenAlex
- W2772693920
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 98
- FWCI
- 14.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ecological distribution conflicts as forces for sustainability: an overview and conceptual framework. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11625-017-0519-0
- The paper
- Scheidel, A., Temper, L., Demaria, F., & Martínez-Alier, J. (2018). Ecological distribution conflicts as forces for sustainability: an overview and conceptual framework. Sustainability Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-017-0519-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.