Cited by 2Wood Treatment and PropertiesBamboo properties and applicationsAdsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal

Analysis and characterization of microstructures of a TiO2/bamboo charcoal composite and modified poplar veneer

Cheng, Da-li, Jiang, Shen-xue, Zhang, Qi-sheng·2012·Forestry Studies in China

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11632-012-0312-1

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cheng, D.-L., Jiang, S.-X., & Zhang, Q.-S.
Affiliations
Nanjing Forestry University (CN)
Venue
Forestry Studies in China
Published
2012-08-08
Volume
14
Issue
3
Pages
240-245
ISSN
  • 1008-1321 (ISSN-L)
  • 1993-0372
OpenAlex
W2035340252
Cited by
2
References
27
Citations by year
2016: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
中国林业科技:英文版 (publishedVersion)
Funders
Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Wood Treatment and Properties
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Bamboo properties and applications
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
Keywords
bamboo charcoal, vacuum pressing, pore structure, specific surface area, pore size distribution, surface morphology, nano-TiO2, wood surface modification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review