Software operational profile based test case allocation using fuzzy logic
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Counterfactual fairness requires output probability distributions to match for input populations that differ only in the label value of a sensitive input characteristic.
“Counterfactual fairness requires output probability distributions to match for input populations that differ only in the label value of a sensitive input characteristic [51].”
From Fairness testing: testing software for discrimination (2017) · cites this paper as [51]
Cites
Software Reliability: Measurement, Prediction, Application
Musa, D., Iannino, A., & Okumoto, K. (1987) · Cited by 1,675 · see citing works
Fuzzy Logic: Intelligence, Control, and Information
Yen, J., & Langari, R. (1998) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,184 · see citing works
Operational profiles in software-reliability engineering
Musa, J. D. (1993) · IEEE Software · doi:10.1109/52.199724 · Cited by 765 · see citing works
Software reliability measurement
Musa, J. D. (1979) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/0164-1212(79)90023-2 · Cited by 569 · see citing works
Application of fuzzy logic to reliability engineering
Bowles, J. B., & Peláez, E. (1995) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.364489 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
A ranking of software engineering measures based on expert opinion
Li, M., & Smidts, C. S. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2003.1232286 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Hamlet, D., & Voas, J. (1993) · ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis (ISSTA) · doi:10.1145/154183.154246 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Software testing and reliability
Horgan, J. R., & Mathur, A. P. (1996) · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Early quality prediction of component-based systems – A generic framework
Grunske, L. (2006) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2006.08.014 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
The operational profile in software reliability engineering: an overview
Musa, D. (2003) · Proceedings/Proceedings - International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering · doi:10.1109/issre.1992.285850 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
A study of user acceptance tests
LEUNG, H. K. N., & WONG, P. W. L. (1997) · Software Quality Journal · doi:10.1023/a:1018503800709 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Software reliability: measurement, prediction, application (professional ed.)
Musa, D., Iannino, A., & Okumoto, K. (1989) · McGraw-Hill, Inc. eBooks · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Software reliability improvement through operational profile driven testing
Arora, S., Misra, R. B., & Kumre, V. M. (2005) · Proceedings, annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium/Proceedings. Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium · doi:10.1109/rams.2005.1408433 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Self-citationHamlet, D., & Voas, J. (1993) · ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes · doi:10.1145/174146.154246 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
A structured approach to improving software-reliability using operational profiles
Pant, H., Franklin, P. H., & Everett, W. W. (2002) · Proceedings, annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium/Proceedings. Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium · doi:10.1109/rams.1994.291097 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
A Framework for Reliability Assessment of Software Components
Shukla, R., Strooper, P. A., & Carrington, D. B. (2004) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-24774-6_24 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 17 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fairness testing: testing software for discrimination
Galhotra, S., Brun, Y., & Meliou, A. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 11th Joint Meeting on Foundations of Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/3106237.3106277 · Cited by 405 · see citing works
Operational profile based software test case allocation
Amrita, A., & Yadav, D. K. (2015) · International Conference on Computing for Sustainable Global Development · Cited by 6 · see citing works
A Novel Method for Allocating Software Test Cases
Amrita, A., & Yadav, D. K. (2015) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2015.07.389 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Logging to Facilitate Combinatorial System Testing
Kruse, P. M., Prasetya, I. S. W. B., Hage, J., & Elyasov, A. (2014) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-07785-7_3 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
A Review of Software Reliability Testing Techniques
Jiang, Z., Li, H., Zhang, D., Wang, R., Zhang, J., Li, X., Zhang, M., & Wang, P. (2021) · Journal of Computing and Information Technology · doi:10.20532/cit.2020.1005155 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
A review of software operational profile in software reliability engineering
Ali-Shahid, M. M., & Sulaiman, S. (2014) · Malaysian Software Engineering Conference (MySEC) · doi:10.1109/mysec.2014.6985980 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Priority-wise Test Case Allocation using Fuzzy Logic
Amrita, A., Gupta, P., & Singh, P. (2021) · International Journal of Systems Assurance Engineering and Management · doi:10.1007/s13198-021-01247-z · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Pair-Wise Time-Aware Test Case Prioritization for Regression Testing
Parashar, P., Kalia, A., & Bhatia, R. K. (2012) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-29166-1_16 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Operational profile development methodology for normative multi-agent systems
Menassel, Y., Marir, T., & Mokhati, F. (2023) · Multiagent and Grid Systems · doi:10.3233/mgs-221507 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Fuzzy Based Paradigm for Requirement Analysis in System Development Life Cycle
Mishra, D. K., & Sharma, M. (2010) · Asia International Conference on Mathematical/Analytical Modelling and Computer Simulation · doi:10.1109/ams.2010.33
Amrita, A., & Yadav, D. K. (2018) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-981-13-1610-4_14
An Operational Profile for Normative Multi-agent Systems
Menassel, Y., Marir, T., & Mokhati, F. (2023) · Lecture notes in information systems and organisation · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-32436-9_2
- Authors
- Kumar, K. S., & Misra, R. B.
- Affiliations
- Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Kumar, K. Saravana
- Venue
- International Journal of Automation and Computing
- Published
- 2007-10
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 388-395
- ISSN
- 1476-8186 (ISSN-L)
- 1751-8520
- OpenAlex
- W2028198237
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Machine Intelligence Research (publishedVersion)
- 国际自动化与计算杂志
- Funders
- University of Ottawa
- Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Software Reliability and Analysis Research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
- Keywords
- fuzzy inference system, usage data, software reliability prediction, software quality assessment, software performance evaluation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
