Cited by 24Eating Disorders and BehaviorsMental Health and PsychiatryPsychology and Mental Health

Pride Before a Fall: Shame, Diagnostic Crossover, and Eating Disorders

Open access
Mortimer, Rose·2019·Journal of Bioethical Inquiry

Abstract

This paper discusses the findings of qualitative research that examined the accounts of five "mostly recovered" ex-patients who had experienced transition between two or more eating disorder diagnoses. This study found that, in the minds of participants, the different diagnostic labels were associated with various good or bad character traits. This contributed to the belief in a diagnostic hierarchy, whereby individuals diagnosed with anorexia nervosa were viewed as morally better than those diagnosed with bulimia nervosa or binge eating disorder. Consequently, diagnostic crossover from a "better" to a "worse" eating disorder was often experienced as shameful moral failing, and a new diagnosis impacted the individual's sense of self-identity. These findings are of significance for both ethicists and clinicians; the paper concludes by outlining the relevance and possible clinical implications of shame in diagnostic crossover and suggesting avenues for future research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11673-019-09923-3

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Mortimer, R. 2015. More than just a label: Identity, diagnosis and recovery from eating disorders. MA dissertation, King’s College London. https://www.academia.edu/37632772/More_than_just_a_label_identity_diagnosis_and_recovery_from_eating_disorders. Accessed June 20 2019.
  2. Prinz J Goldie P The moral emotions. In The Oxford handbook of philosophy of emotion 2009 Oxford Oxford University Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mortimer, R.
Affiliations
Warneford Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Mortimer, Rose
Venue
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
Published
2019-07-01
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
365-374
ISSN
  • 1176-7529 (ISSN-L)
  • 1872-4353
OpenAlex
W2956132224
Cited by
24
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Bioethical Inquiry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust ([104825/Z/14/Z])
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
Keywords
eating disorders, shame, moral failing, anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, binge eating disorder, diagnostic hierarchy, self-identity, recovery, character traits
MeSH terms
Weight Prejudice, Adult, Anorexia Nervosa, Attitude, Ethics, Medical, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Morals, Self Concept, Shame, Qualitative Research, Bulimia Nervosa, Young Adult, Binge-Eating Disorder

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review