Cited by 29Eating Disorders and BehaviorsChild Nutrition and Feeding IssuesPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

Inaccessibility of care and inequitable conceptions of suffering: a collective response to the construction of “terminal” anorexia nervosa

Open access
Sharpe, Sam L., Adams, Marissa, Smith, Emil K., Urban, Bek, Silverstein, Scout·2023·Journal of Eating Disorders

Abstract

Informed by our lived experiences with eating disorders, our work providing direct support to communities underserved by existing healthcare structures, and our commitment to social justice, we are deeply troubled by several aspects of the proposed characteristics for "terminal" anorexia nervosa outlined by Gaudiani et al. in Journal of Eating Disorders (10:23, 2022). We have identified two substantial areas of concern in the proposed characteristics provided by Gaudiani et al. and the subsequent publication by Yager et al. (10:123, 2022). First, the original article and the subsequent publication fail to adequately address the widespread inaccessibility of eating disorder treatment, the lack of parameters for what constitutes "high quality care", and the prevalence of trauma experienced in treatment settings for those who do access treatment. Second, the characteristics proposed for "terminal" anorexia nervosa are constructed largely based on subjective and inconsistent valuations of suffering which build on and contribute to harmful and inaccurate eating disorder stereotypes. Overall, we believe these proposed characteristics in their current form stand to detract from, rather than assist, the ability of patients and providers to make informed, compassionate, and patient-centered decisions about safety and autonomy both for individuals with enduring eating disorders and for individuals with more recently diagnosed eating disorders.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s40337-023-00791-2

Cites

98 of 98 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [61]Mehler PS Andersen AE Eating disorders: a comprehensive guide to medical care and complications 2022 4 Baltimore Johns Hopkins University Press 50 54
  2. [64]Gaudiani JL. Sick enough: a guide to the medical complications of eating disorders. New York: Routledge; 2019. p. 4, 10, 97, 179, 185.

Authors
Sharpe, S. L., Adams, M., Smith, E. K., Urban, B., & Silverstein, S.
Corresponding author
Sharpe, Sam L.
Venue
Journal of Eating Disorders
Published
2023-05-02
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
66-66
ISSN
2050-2974 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4367834073
Cited by
29
References
98
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 2
FWCI
8.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Eating Disorders (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
anorexia nervosa, health disparities, suffering, quality of care, patient autonomy, social justice, lived experience, treatment safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review