Modification of faba bean protein isolate by high-intensity ultrasound treatment: Screening of physicochemical, thermal, and structural properties
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the impacts of high-intensity ultrasound treatments on the physicochemical, thermal, and structural properties of faba bean protein isolates (FPI). Aqueous FPI suspensions were sonicated at 20 kHz for 1, 3, 5, and 10 min. Ultrasound treatment increased the solubility of FPI at all sonicated times, with maximum solubility (89.11%) observed at the 3-min treatment. Particle size (from 370.47 to 187.87 nm) and zeta potential (from − 40.83 to − 37.17 mV) reduction (in magnitude) by sonication were observed at all studied times. The usage of ultrasound has been found to have a more pronounced antibrowning impact compared to unsonication (higher L* and b* , lower a*, C* , H* , BI, and ΔE ). With the increase in sonication treatment from 0 to 3 min, the T d decreased from 103.07 to 99.58 °C and ΔH d from 2.21 to 1.12 J/g, which were related to the changes in the secondary structure of proteins. Sonication changed the secondary structure of FPI, decreasing the α-helix, β-turn, and random coil content, and increasing the β-sheet for samples treated up to 3 min. Prolonged sonication increased the α-helices due to the extension of certain types of hydrogen bonds in the structure. The microstructural changes of FPI caused by ultrasound were further validated through observations made using a scanning electron microscope, which revealed the presence of smaller fragments. The present study indicates that the use of ultrasound has the potential to improve the functionality of FPI, hence potentially enhancing the efficacy of FPI-based food products. Graphical abstract
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The slight increase in transition temperatures for FB-70-US may reflect ultrasound-induced rearrangement of intermolecular interactions.
“The slight increase in these transition temperatures for FB-70-US may reflect ultrasound-induced rearrangement of intermo lecular interactions (Adal, 2024; Rahman & Lamsal, 2021).”
From Effects of ultrasonication on structure and gelation of plant proteins at different denaturation states (2027) · cites this paper as Adal, 2024
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Effect of ultrasound treatment on quality and microbial load of carrot juice
ZOU, Y., & JIANG, A. (2016) · Food Science and Technology · doi:10.1590/1678-457x.0061 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 34
- R.S. Bhatty, G.I. Christison, Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 34, 41-51 (1984). https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ BF010 95071 · DOI
- S.B. Dhull, M.K. Kidwai, R. Noor, P. Chawla, P.K. Rose, Legum Sci. (2021). https:// doi. org/ 10. 1002/ leg3. 129 · DOI
- J.E. Kinsella, N. Melachouris, Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 7, 219- 280 (1976). https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 10408 39760 95272 08 · DOI
- Y. Wang, Y. Wang, K. Li, Y. Bai, B. Li, W. Xu, LWT 129, 109563 (2020). https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/J. LWT. 2020. 109563 · DOI
- D.J. McClements, Trends Food Sci. Technol. 6, 293-299 (1995). https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/ S0924-2244(00) 89139-6 · DOI
- M.M. Rahman, B.P. Lamsal, Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 20, 1457-1480 (2021). https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/ 1541-4337. 12709 · DOI · Paper page
- O.A. Higuera-Barraza, C.L. Del Toro-Sanchez, S. Ruiz-Cruz, E. Márquez-Ríos, Ultrason. Sonochem. 31, 558-562 (2016). https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/J. ULTSO NCH. 2016. 02. 007 · DOI
- M.R. Zuniga-Salcedo, J.A. Ulloa, P.U. Bautısta-Rosales, P. Rosas- Ulloa, J.C. Ramírez-Ramíez, Y. Silva-Carrilo, R. Gutıérrez-Leyva, C. Hernández, Ital. J. Food Sci. 31, 3 (2019). https:// doi. org/ 10. 14674/ IJFS-1440 · DOI
- B. Nazari, M.A. Mohammadifar, S. Shojaee-Aliabadi, E. Feizol- lahi, L. Mirmoghtadaie, Ultrason. Sonochem. 41, 382-388 (2018). https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/J. ULTSO NCH. 2017. 10. 002 · DOI
- H. Li, Y. Hu, X. Zhao, W. Wan, X. Du, B. Kong, X. Xia, LWT 137, 110403 (2021). https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/J. LWT. 2020. 110403 · DOI
- H. Hu, J. Wu, E.C.Y. Li-Chan, L. Zhu, F. Zhang, X. Xu, G. Fan, L. Wang, X. Huang, S. Pan, Food Hydrocoll. 30, 647-655 (2013). https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/J. FOODH YD. 2012. 08. 001 · DOI
- B. Lo, S. Kasapis, A. Farahnaky, Food Hydrocoll. 124, 107345 (2022). https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/J. FOODH YD. 2021. 107345 · DOI
- A. Martínez-Velasco, C. Lobato-Calleros, B.E. Hernández-Rod- ríguez, A. Román-Guerrero, J. Alvarez-Ramirez, E.J. Vernon- Carter, Ultrason. Sonochem. 44, 97-105 (2018). https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/J. ULTSO NCH. 2018. 02. 007 · DOI
- F. Alavi, L. Chen, Z. Emam-Djomeh, Food Chem. 354(129494), 5 (2021). https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/J. FOODC HEM. 2021. 129494 · DOI
- A.R. Jambrak, V. Lelas, T.J. Mason, G. Krešić, M. Badanjak, J. Food Eng. 93, 386-393 (2009). https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/J. JFOOD ENG. 2009. 02. 001 · DOI
- A.R. Jambrak, T.J. Mason, V. Lelas, Z. Herceg, I.L. Herceg, J. Food Eng. 86, 281-287 (2008). https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/J. JFOOD ENG. 2007. 10. 004 · DOI
- Z. Zhang, J.M. Regenstein, P. Zhou, Y. Yang, Ultrason. Sono- chem. 34, 960-967 (2017). https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/J. ULTSO NCH. 2016. 08. 008 · DOI
- L. Jiang, J. Wang, Y. Li, Z. Wang, J. Liang, R. Wang, Y. Chen, W. Ma, V. Qi, M. Zhang, Food Res. Int. 62, 595-601 (2014). https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/J. FOODR ES. 2014. 04. 022 · DOI
- N.A. Mir, C.S. Riar, S. Singh, Food Hydrocoll 96, 433-441 (2019). https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/J. FOODH YD. 2019. 05. 052 · DOI
- D.E.S.H. Azab, R.I.M. Almoselhy, M.H. Mahmoud, J. Food Pro- cess. Preserv. 46, e17235 (2022). https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/ jfpp. 17235 · DOI
- J. Chandrapala, B. Zisu, M. Palmer, S. Kentish, M. Ashokku- mar, Ultrason. Sonochem. 18, 951-957 (2011). https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/J. ULTSO NCH. 2010. 12. 016 · DOI
- C. Zhao, Z. Chu, Z. Miao, J. Liu, J. Liu, X. Xu, Y. Wu, B. Qi, J. Yan, Food Biosci. 39, 100827 (2021). https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/J. FBIO. 2020. 100827 · DOI
- C. Arzeni, K. Martínez, P. Zema, A. Arias, O.E. Pérez, A.M.R. Pilosof, J. Food Eng. 108, 463-472 (2012). https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/J. JFOOD ENG. 2011. 08. 018 · DOI
- T. Xiong, W. Xiong, M. Ge, J. Xia, B. Li, Y. Chen, Food Res. Int. 109, 260-267 (2018). https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/J. FOODR ES. 2018. 04. 044 · DOI
- M.N. Islam, M. Zhang, B. Adhikari, C. Xinfeng, B.G. Xu, Int. J. Refrig. 42, 121-133 (2014). https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. ijref rig. 2014. 02. 012 · DOI
- B.K. Tiwari, K. Muthukumarappan, C.P. O'Donnell, P.J. Cullen, LWT 41, 1876-1883 (2008). https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. lwt. 2007. 11. 0164 · DOI
- X. Bi, Y. Hemar, M.O. Balaban, X. Liao, Ultrason. Sonochem. 27, 567-575 (2015). https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/J. ULTSO NCH. 2015. 04. 011 · DOI
- P. Kaushik, K. Dowling, S. McKnight, C.J. Barrow, B. Wang, B. Adhikari, Food Chem. 197, 212-220 (2016). https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/J. FOODC HEM. 2015. 09. 106 · DOI
- J. Kong, S. Yu, Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin. (Shanghai) 39, 549- 559 (2007). https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/j. 1745-7270. 2007. 00320.x · DOI
- J.B. Johnson, K. Walsh, M. Naiker, Legum Sci. 2(3), e40 (2020). https:// doi. org/ 10. 1002/ LEG3. 40 · DOI
- Y. Meng, Z. Liang, C. Zhang, S. Hao, H. Han, P. Du, A. Li, H. Shao, C. Li, L. Liu, LWT 152, 112272 (2021). https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/J. LWT. 2021. 112272 · DOI
- J. Jin, H. Ma, B. Wang, A.E.G.A. Yagoub, K. Wang, R. He, C. Zhou, Ultrason. Sonochem. 30, 44-51 (2016). https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/J. ULTSO NCH. 2015. 11. 021 · DOI · Paper page
- K. Gao, F. Zha, Z. Yang, J. Rao, B. Chen, Food Hydrocoll. 125, 107409 (2022). https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/J. FOODH YD. 2021. 107409 · DOI
- R. Tian, J. Feng, G. Huang, B. Tian, Y. Zhang, L. Jiang, X. Sui, Ultrason. Sonochem. 68, 105202 (2020). https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/J. ULTSO NCH. 2020. 105202 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Zhu, M., Kasapis, S., & Dhital, S. (2027) · Food Hydrocolloids · doi:10.1016/j.foodhyd.2026.113251
- Authors
- Adal, E.
- ORCID
- Adal, E.
- Venue
- Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization
- Published
- 2024-02-10
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 2438-2449
- ISSN
- 2193-4126
- 2193-4134
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
- Funders
- İskenderun Technical University
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review