Cited by 112Bariatric Surgery and OutcomesMinimally Invasive Surgical TechniquesAirway Management and Intubation Techniques

Dumping Symptoms and Incidence of Hypoglycaemia After Provocation Test at 6 and 12 Months After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy

Papamargaritis, Dimitris, Koukoulis, George, Sioka, Eleni, Zachari, Eleni, Bargiota, Alexandra, Zacharoulis, Dimitris, Tzovaras, George·2012·Obesity Surgery

Abstract

Background A previous study has demonstrated that symptoms suggestive of dumping syndrome appear after a provocation test early after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in 45 % of patients, and these are mainly related to early dumping. The aim of this study is to evaluate the evolution of dumping symptoms during the first postoperative year. Methods Twenty-five non-diabetic morbidly obese patients (6 male, 19 female) were evaluated with an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) preoperatively, at 6 weeks and at 6 months postoperatively. In addition, 12 of them repeated the OGTT at 12 months after LSG. Sigstad score was used to separate dumpers from non-dumpers and Arts' questionnaire to differentiate between early and late dumping. Insulin and glucose levels were also measured. Results Sigstad score remained significantly elevated at 6 and 12 months postoperatively compared to preoperative values. Symptoms suggestive of dumping syndrome were recorded in 40 % of patients at 6 months and in 33 % at 12 months postoperatively. Arts' questionnaire demonstrated that early dumping score remained higher compared to baseline at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Late dumping scores increased gradually during the time and that difference was statistically significant at 12 months after LSG. Hypoglycaemia occurred at 33 % of patients both at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Conclusions Symptoms suggestive of dumping syndrome after provocation still exist at 6 and 12 months in a significan…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11695-012-0711-3

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Papamargaritis, D., Koukoulis, G., Sioka, E., Zachari, E., Bargiota, A., Zacharoulis, D., & Tzovaras, G.
Affiliations
University Hospital of Larissa (GR)
Corresponding author
Tzovaras, George
Venue
Obesity Surgery
Published
2012-07-07
Volume
22
Issue
10
Pages
1600-1606
ISSN
  • 0960-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1708-0428
OpenAlex
W2003154817
Cited by
112
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4
FWCI
7.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Obesity Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
Keywords
dumping syndrome, laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy
MeSH terms
Adult, Dumping Syndrome, Feeding Behavior, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Glucose Tolerance Test, Humans, Hypoglycemia, Male, Obesity, Morbid, Laparoscopy, Surveys and Questionnaires, Time Factors, Gastroplasty, Body Mass Index, Incidence, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review