Cited by 145Probiotics and Fermented FoodsMicrobial Metabolites in Food BiotechnologyGut microbiota and health

Consumption of synbiotic bread decreases triacylglycerol and VLDL levels while increasing HDL levels in serum from patients with type-2 diabetes

Shakeri, Hossein, Hadaegh, Haleh, Abedi, Fatemeh, Tajabadi‐Ebrahimi, Maryam, Mazroii, Navid, Ghandi, Yaser, Asemi, Zatollah·2014·Lipids

Abstract

To our knowledge, no reports are available indicating the favorable effects of synbiotic bread consumption on blood lipid profiles among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of the daily consumption of synbiotic bread on blood lipid profiles of patients with T2DM. This randomized double‐blinded controlled clinical trial was performed with 78 diabetic patients, aged 35–70 years. After a 2‐week run‐in period, subjects were randomly assigned to consume either synbiotic (n = 26), probiotic (n = 26) or control bread (n = 26) for 8 weeks. The synbiotic bread contained viable and heat‐resistant probiotic Lactobacillus sporogenes (1 × 10 8 CFU) and 0.07 g inulin (HPX) as prebiotic per 1 g. The probiotic bread contained L. sporogenes (1 × 10 8 CFU) per 1 g. Patients were asked to consume the synbiotic, probiotic and control breads three times a day in a 40 g package for a total of 120 g/day. Biochemical measurements including blood lipid profiles were conducted before and after 8 weeks of intervention. Consumption of the synbiotic bread, compared to the probiotic and control breads, led to a significant decrease in serum TAG (P = 0.005), VLDL‐C (P = 0.005), TC/HDL‐C (P = 0.002) and a significant increase in serum HDL‐C levels (P = 0.01). No significant effect of synbiotic bread consumption on FPG, TC, LDL‐C and non‐HDL‐C levels was seen compared to the probiotic and control breads (P > 0.05). Trial registry code: http://www.irct.ir IRCT201311215623N13.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11745-014-3901-z

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

2 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shakeri, H., Hadaegh, H., Abedi, F., Tajabadi‐Ebrahimi, M., Mazroii, N., Ghandi, Y., & Asemi, Z.
Affiliations
  • Kashan University of Medical Sciences (IR)
  • Department of Research and Development of Sahar Bread Company Tehran Islamic Republic of Iran
  • Faculty Member of Science Department, Science Faculty Islamic Azad University, Tehran Central Branch Tehran Islamic Republic of Iran
Corresponding author
Asemi, Zatollah
Venue
Lipids
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-04-06
Volume
49
Issue
7
Pages
695-701
ISSN
  • 0024-4201 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-9307
OpenAlex
W2098702370
Cited by
145
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 5
FWCI
13.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Lipids (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, lipid profile, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, VLDL cholesterol, Bacillus coagulans, inulin, prebiotics, probiotics, dietary intervention
MeSH terms
Bread, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diet, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Lipoproteins, HDL, Lipoproteins, VLDL, Male, Middle Aged, Triglycerides, Synbiotics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review