Cited by 50Cancer survivorship and careNursing care and researchAttachment and Relationship Dynamics

Psychosocial interventions to support partners of men with prostate cancer: a systematic and critical review of the literature

Open access
Wootten, A. C., Abbott, J. M., Farrell, A., Austin, D. W., Klein, B.·2014·Journal of Cancer Survivorship

Abstract

Purpose Prostate cancer poses many challenges for both the man and his partner. Partners have reported a range of issues that impact their own mental health following their partner's diagnosis of prostate cancer. The aim of this review is to summarise and critically evaluate the current literature reporting psychosocial intervention studies for partners of prostate cancer patients.Methods An extensive literature search of electronic databases was conducted (OvidMEDLINE 1946, 26th September 2013, and psychINFO 1967, 26th September 2013) using the keywords prostate cancer AND intervention* OR therapy* OR psychosocial intervention* OR support* AND couple* or Spouse* or Partner* or Intimate partner* matched to the title as well as secondary scanning of reference lists. Studies were included if they described interventions for partners of prostate cancer patients, either solely for the partners or as a couple, intended to alleviate distress and enhance the partner's or couple's quality of life, and reported a measurable outcome for partners.Results A total of 11 prostate cancer-specific intervention studies that included partners and reported separate results for the partners were found. Only one of these interventions was partner specific, the other eight involved the patient-partner dyad. The studies identified primarily focussed on two areas: emotional distress and sexual intimacy, and mixed findings were reported for efficacy of interventions.Conclusions Despite strong evidence that partners of men with prostate cancer experience difficulties associated with the impact of prostate cancer, there is limited research that has investigated the efficacy of psychosocial interventions for partners. Of the reviewed studies, it is evident that interventions targeting the reduction of emotional distress, improved communication and sexual intimacy between the couple and utilisation of strategies that enable partners to express their distress, learn new strategies and implement behavioural change show the most promising results in enhancing partner well-being.Implications for cancer survivors Significant progress is required in developing and evaluating appropriate and effective psychosocial support interventions for partners of prostate cancer survivors as partners appear to have significant unmet needs in this area.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11764-014-0361-7

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wootten, A. C., Abbott, J. M., Farrell, A., Austin, D. W., & Klein, B.
Affiliations
  • The Royal Melbourne Hospital (AU)
  • Epworth Hospital (AU)
  • Deakin University (AU)
  • Federation University (AU)
Corresponding author
Wootten, A. C.
Venue
Journal of Cancer Survivorship
Published
2014-04-22
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
472-484
ISSN
  • 1932-2259 (ISSN-L)
  • 1932-2267
OpenAlex
W2041602608
Cited by
50
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cancer Survivorship (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Deakin Research Online (Deakin University) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Keywords
prostate cancer, partners of cancer patients, psychosocial interventions, couple dyads, emotional distress, sexual intimacy, couple communication, partner well-being, cancer survivorship, spousal support
MeSH terms
Communication, Female, Humans, Male, Prostatic Neoplasms, Sexual Behavior, Spouses

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review