Cited by 335Cancer survivorship and careNursing care and researchFamily Support in Illness

Randomized clinical trial of a family intervention for prostate cancer patients and their spouses

Open access
Northouse, Laurel L., Mood, Darlene W., Schafenacker, Ann, Montie, James E., Sandler, Howard M., Forman, Jeffrey D., Hussain, Maha, Pienta, Kenneth J. +2 more·2007·Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND.: Few intervention studies have been conducted to help couples manage the effects of prostate cancer and maintain their quality of life. The objective of this study was to determine whether a family‐based intervention could improve appraisal variables (appraisal of illness or caregiving, uncertainty, hopelessness), coping resources (coping strategies, self‐efficacy, communication), symptom distress, and quality of life in men with prostate cancer and their spouses. METHODS.: For this clinical trial, 263 patient‐spouse dyads were stratified by research site, phase of illness, and treatment; then, they were randomized to the control group (standard care) or the experimental group (standard care plus a 5‐session family intervention). The intervention targeted couples' communication, hope, coping, uncertainty, and symptom management. The final sample consisted of 235 couples: 123 couples in the control group and 112 couples in the experimental group. Data collection occurred at baseline before randomization and at 4 months, 8 months, and 12 months. RESULTS.: At 4‐month follow‐up, intervention patients reported less uncertainty and better communication with spouses than control patients, but they reported no other effects. Intervention spouses reported higher quality of life, more self‐efficacy, better communication, and less negative appraisal of caregiving, uncertainty, hopelessness, and symptom distress at 4 months compared with controls, and some effects were sustained to 8 months and 12 months. CONCLUSIONS.: Men with prostate cancer and their spouses reported positive outcomes from a family intervention that offered them information and support. Programs of care need to be extended to spouses who likely will experience multiple benefits from intervention. Cancer 2007. © 2007 American Cancer Society.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cncr.23114

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [1]1. Kornblith AB, Herr HW, Ofman US, et al. Quality of life of patients with prostate cancer and their spouses. The value of a data base in clinical care. Cancer. 1994;73:2791-2802.
  2. [8]8. Lepore SJ, Helgeson VS. Psychoeducational support group enhances quality of life after prostate cancer. Cancer Res Ther Contr. 1999;8:81-91.
  3. [27]27. McMillan SC, Small BJ, Weitzner M, et al. Impact of coping skills intervention with family caregivers of hospice patients with cancer. Cancer. 2006;106:214-222.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Northouse, L. L., Mood, D. W., Schafenacker, A., Montie, J. E., Sandler, H. M., Forman, J. D., Hussain, M., Pienta, K. J., Smith, D. C., & Kershaw, T.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Wayne State University (US)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Northouse, Laurel L.
Venue
Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-11-12
Volume
110
Issue
12
Pages
2809-2818
ISSN
  • 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0142
OpenAlex
W1966341062
Cited by
335
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 25
FWCI
6.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (R01CA90739)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Family Support in Illness
Keywords
prostate cancer, family intervention, couples, spouses, dyadic intervention, coping, uncertainty, hopelessness, self-efficacy, couple communication, symptom distress, quality of life, caregiving, symptom management
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Education as Topic, Prostatic Neoplasms, Quality of Life, Social Support, Treatment Outcome, Spouses

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review