Cited by 37Nursing care and researchCancer survivorship and careIntergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving

Caregiving burden among informal caregivers of African American cancer survivors

Open access
Schwartz, K., Beebe-Dimmer, J., Hastert, T. A., Ruterbusch, J. J., Mantey, J., Harper, F., Thompson, H., Pandolfi, S. +1 more·2021·Journal of Cancer Survivorship

Abstract

Purpose Relatively little is known about caregivers of African American cancer survivors. Our goal was to identify the extent of burden among this group of caregivers. Methods Responses from 560 informal caregivers of African American participants of the Research on Cancer Survivors (ROCS) study in Detroit, MI, were analyzed including demographics, assistance provided including activities of daily living (ADLs) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs), time spent in caregiving, and caregiver burden (CGB). We assessed relationships between CGB and demographic variables, ADLs/IADLs, and level of care. Multivariable logistic regression determined which ADLs and IADLs were associated with high CGB. Results Over 75% of caregivers were female and 97% identified as African American. Mean age was 52.6 years. Fifty-six percent were employed outside the home, and 90% were related to the survivor. Caregivers averaged 35.7 h/week providing care, assisting with on average 2.8 ADLs and 5.0 IADLs. Despite the many hours and activities reported, no caregivers rated CGB as severe; only 4% rated it moderate to severe. ADLs associated with the top quartile of CGB were feeding and toileting; IADLs were finances, telephoning, housework, and medications. Conclusions Caregivers for African American cancer survivors provide many hours of care, yet most describe their CGB as low. Although ADL assistance is often available through the healthcare system, assistance with IADLs presents an opportunity to lessen the burden for these caregivers and their care recipients. Implications for cancer survivors African American cancer survivors receive much care from informal family caregivers, who assist with multiple ADLs and IADLs. Formal IADL assistance programs, similar to those available for ADLs, would benefit both survivors and caregivers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11764-020-00956-x

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Schwartz et al. found that only assistance with feeding and toileting are independently associated with higher caregiver burden among caregivers of patients with cancer of different stages.

    “They found that only the assistance with feeding and toileting are independently associated with higher CB among caregivers of patients with cancer of different stages.”

    From Caregiver burden among family caregivers of incurable cancer patients in two eastern Mediterranean countries (2021) · cites this paper as [5]

    The Results report adjusted associations between high caregiver burden and assistance with feeding and toileting. But they also report associations with help with finances, telephoning, housework, and medications, so the claim that feeding and toileting were the only associated activities is not supported. The study included survivors at local, regional, and distant stages. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. [2]American Cancer Society Cancer Facts and Figures 2020. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2020. PMC7848816 33532112
  2. [3]Brédart A, Kop JL, Beaudeau A, Quality of care in the oncology outpatient setting from patients’ perspective: A systematic review of questionnaires’ content and psychometric performance. Psycho-Oncology 2014; 24: 382– 394. 25196048
  3. [6]Kent EE, Dionne-Odom JN. Population-based profile of mental health and support service need among family caregivers of adults with cancer. J Oncol Pract 2019; 15; e122– e131. 30496020 PMC6550025
  4. [7]Kent EE, Rowland JH, Northouse L, Caring for caregivers and patients: Research and clinical priorities for informal cancer caregiving. Cancer 2014; 122: 1987– 1995. PMC5597246 26991807
  5. [9]Martin MY, Sanders S, Griffin JM, Racial variation in the cancer caregiving experience: A multi-site study of colorectal and lung cancer caregivers. Cancer Nurs 2012; 35: 249– 256. 22088979 PMC3326192
  6. [10]Siegel K, Raveis VH, Houts P, Mor V. Caregiver burden and unmet patient needs. Cancer 1991; 68(5): 1131– 1140. 1913486
  7. [12]Palos GR, Mendoza TR, Liao KP, Caregiver symptom burden: the risk of caring for an underserved patient with advanced cancer. Cancer 2011; 117: 1070– 1079. 20960510 PMC3065823
  8. [13]Martin CD. More than the work: Race and gender differences in caregiving burden. J Family Issues 2000; 21: 986– 1005.
  9. [15]Ferrell B and Wittenberg E. A review of family caregiving intervention trials in oncology. CA Cancer J Clin 2017; 67: 318– 325. 28319263
  10. [17]Beebe-Dimmer JL, Ruterbusch JJ, Harper F, Physical activity and quality of life in African American cancer survivors: The Detroit Research on Cancer Survivors Study. Cancer 2020; 126: 1987– 1994. 32090322 PMC8293666
  11. [18]Edemekong PF, Bomgaars DL, Sukumaran S, Levy SB. Activities of Daily Living. StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island FL. StatPearls Publishing, 2020. 29261878
  12. [19]Zarit SH, Reever KE, Back-Peterson J. Relatives of the impaired elderly: correlates of feelings of burden. Gerontologist 1980; 20: 649– 655. 7203086
  13. [20]Van Durme T, Macq J, Jeanmart C, Gobert M. Tools for measuring the impact of informal caregiving of the elderly; a literature review. Int J Nurs Stud 2012; 49: 490– 504. 22078211
  14. [21]Longmire CVF and Knight BG. Confirmatory factor analysis of a brief version of the Zarit Burden Interview in black and white dementia caregivers. Gerontologist 2011; 51: 453– 462. 21402646 PMC3146806
  15. [22]Hebert R, Bravo G, Preville M. Reliability, validity and reference values of the Zarit Burden Interview for assessing informal caregivers of community-dwelling older persons with dementia. Can J Aging 2000; 19: 494– 507.
  16. [23]Pilkonis PA, Choi SW, Reise SP Item banks for measuring emotional distress from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): depression, anxiety, and anger. Assessment 2011; 18: 263– 83. 21697139 PMC3153635
  17. [25]Thomson MD, Cadua A, Matsuyama R, Siminoff LA. Abstract A092: Cancer caregiver burden and mental health outcomes: differences by race/ethnicity. Presented at the 11th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; Nov 2–5, 2018; New Orleans, LA.
  18. [26]Ge L and Mordiffi SZ. Factors associated with higher caregiver burden among family caregivers of elderly cancer patients. A systematic review. Cancer Nursing 2017; 40: 471– 478. 29045247
  19. [27]Hsu T, Loscalzo M, Ramani R, Factors associated with high burden in caregivers of older adults with cancer. Cancer 2014; 120: 2927– 2935. 24898093 PMC4159406
  20. [28]Kim Y, Baker F, Spillers RL. Cancer caregivers’ quality of life: effects of gender, relationship, and appraisal. J Pain Symptom Manage 2007; 34: 294– 304. 17572056
  21. [29]Hastert TA, Ruterbusch JJ, Nair M, Employment outcomes, financial burden, anxiety, and depression among caregivers of African American cancer survivors. JCO Oncol Pract 2020; 16: e221– e233. 31496392 PMC7069702
  22. [30]Vines AI and Demissie Z. Racial differences in social support and coping among family caregivers of patients with prostate cancer. J Psychosoc Oncol 2013; 31: 305– 318 23656257 PMC5806533
  23. [32]Liu C, Badana ANS, Burgdorf J, Fabius CD, Roth DL, Haley WE. Systematic review and meta-analysis of racial and ethnic differences in dementia caregivers’ well-being. Gerontologist 2020; XX: 1– 16. PMC8276619 32271380

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schwartz, K., Beebe-Dimmer, J., Hastert, T. A., Ruterbusch, J. J., Mantey, J., Harper, F., Thompson, H., Pandolfi, S., & Schwartz, A. G.
Affiliations
Wayne State University (US)
Corresponding author
Schwartz, K.
Venue
Journal of Cancer Survivorship
Published
2020-10-17
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
630-640
ISSN
  • 1932-2259 (ISSN-L)
  • 1932-2267
OpenAlex
W3093221258
Cited by
37
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
FWCI
5.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cancer Survivorship (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
NIH/NCI (U01CA199240, HHSN2612612013000011I)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
Keywords
caregiver burden, informal caregivers, African American cancer survivors, activities of daily living, instrumental activities of daily living, family caregiving
MeSH terms
Cancer Survivors, Activities of Daily Living, Black or African American, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review