Cited by 14Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchNasal Surgery and Airway StudiesSleep and related disorders

Surgical correction of nasal obstruction in obstructive sleep apnea improves CPAP outcomes and compliance

Elwany, Samy, Bahgat, Ahmed Yassin, Ibrahim, Mahmoud, Bazak, Remon·2022·Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -)

Abstract

Background Although continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy curtails most of the negative impacts of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), its efficacy is limited by its low long-term adherence. Nasal obstruction contributes to OSA pathophysiology and necessitates high CPAP titration pressures which reduce CPAP compliance.Aim This study aims at elucidating the outcomes of surgical correction of nasal obstruction in patients intolerant to CPAP therapy.Methods Forty-nine patients with severe OSA intolerant to CPAP secondary to surgically correctable nasal obstruction were operated upon. Patients were evaluated preoperatively and at least 3 months after the surgical intervention. Subjective assessment entailed the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation score (NOSE) and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS). Objectively the patients were assessed by acoustic rhinometry and standard polysomnography.Results Nasal surgical intervention resulted in an a statistically significant decrease in the mean NOSE score, ESS and optimal CPAP titration pressure. In addition, the minimal cross-sectional area (MCA1&2) increased significantly postoperatively. There was a positive correlation between the improvement in NOSE score as well as the MCA1& 2 and the postoperative decrease in CPAP titration pressure. Surgical correction of nasal obstruction improved CPAP outcomes and compliance in all patients.Conclusions Nasal surgery in OSA objectively assessed by acoustic rhinometry improved nasal obstruction with a resultant decrease in the CPAP pressure requirements. Given that lower CPAP pressures improve adherence to CPAP therapy, surgical alleviation of nasal obstruction should be considered a crucial intervention in the management armamentarium of OSA.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11845-021-02896-6

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Elwany, S., Bahgat, A. Y., Ibrahim, M., & Bazak, R.
Affiliations
Alexandria University (EG)
Corresponding author
Bazak, Remon
Venue
Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -)
Published
2022-01-27
Volume
191
Issue
6
Pages
2723-2728
ISSN
  • 0021-1265 (ISSN-L)
  • 1863-4362
OpenAlex
W4210316765
Cited by
14
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
Keywords
obstructive sleep apnea, nasal obstruction, nasal surgery, CPAP adherence, acoustic rhinometry, sleepiness
MeSH terms
Humans, Patient Compliance, Nasal Obstruction, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive, Rhinometry, Acoustic, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review