Cited by 52Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchNasal Surgery and Airway StudiesSleep and related disorders

The efficacy of nasal surgery in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: A prospective clinical study

Sufioğlu, Mansur, Ozmen, Omer Afşin, Kasapoglu, Fikret, Demir, Uygar Levent, Ursavas, Ahmet, Erişen, Levent, Onart, Selcuk·2012·European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of surgical intervention for nasal pathologies on obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) titrations in patients with OSAS. The study was designed as a prospective case control study. Between December 2007 and June 2010, 31 patients (26 men and 5 women) who were diagnosed with OSAS with polysomnography and confirmed to have obstructive nasal pathology were enrolled in the study. The average age of the patients was 53 ± 9.6 (range 33-68 years) and the body mass index ranged from 22 to 40.6 kg/m(2) with an average of 30.3 ± 4.1. The patients were evaluated with Epworth Sleepiness Scale, OSAS Complaints Questionnaire, visual analog scale, and CPAP titration before and 3 months after nasal surgery. As three patients did not attend the control polysomnography, data analysis was performed on 28 patients. Although there was a significant improvement in the nasal passage and subjective complaints, namely, snoring frequency, apnea and daytime sleepiness, the difference between preoperative and postoperative AHI values was not statistically significant. Postoperative CPAP titration results indicated a decrease both in pressures and in AHI in comparison to preoperative values. These reductions were not statistically significant, although the decrease in CPAP pressures was close to significance (p = 0.062). Nasal pathologies should be treated in all patients with OSAS, particularly those undergoing CPAP treatment. However, patients should be counseled that favorable results might not be achieved after nasal surgery.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00405-011-1682-z

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sufioğlu, M., Ozmen, O. A., Kasapoglu, F., Demir, U. L., Ursavas, A., Erişen, L., & Onart, S.
Affiliations
  • Bursa Uludağ Üni̇versi̇tesi̇ (TR)
  • Acıbadem University (TR)
Venue
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
Published
2011-07-15
Volume
269
Issue
2
Pages
487-494
ISSN
  • 0937-4477 (ISSN-L)
  • 1434-4726
OpenAlex
W2063609565
Cited by
52
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3
FWCI
1.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bursa Uludag University - AVESIS (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
Keywords
obstructive sleep apnea, nasal surgery, nasal obstruction, continuous positive airway pressure, CPAP titration, apnea-hypopnea index, daytime sleepiness, snoring, surgical outcomes
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Endoscopy, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nasal Septum, Postoperative Complications, Prospective Studies, Rhinoplasty, Turbinates, Nasal Obstruction, Catheter Ablation, Polysomnography, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review