Cited by 11Corporate Social Responsibility ReportingAuditing, Earnings Management, GovernanceFinancial Reporting and XBRL

How do sustainability reports from the Nordic and the Mediterranean European countries compare

Branco, Manuel Castelo, Delgado, Catarina, Marques, Carla·2018·Review of Managerial Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11846-017-0233-4

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Branco, M. C., Delgado, C., & Marques, C.
Affiliations
Universidade do Porto (PT)
Corresponding author
Branco, Manuel Castelo
Venue
Review of Managerial Science
Published
2017-03-09
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
917-936
ISSN
  • 1863-6683 (ISSN-L)
  • 1863-6691
OpenAlex
W2593931997
Cited by
11
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Review of Managerial Science (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Financial Reporting and XBRL
Keywords
sustainability reporting, corporate disclosure, Nordic countries, Mediterranean countries, varieties of capitalism, Global Reporting Initiative, firm characteristics, institutional environment, cross-national comparison, industry affiliation, firm size, listing status

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review