CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 71

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pollen Allergens for Molecular Diagnosis

Pablos, Isabel, Wildner, Sabrina, Asam, Claudia, Wallner, Michael, Gadermaier, Gabriele·2016·Current Allergy and Asthma Reports
DOI 10.1007/s11882-016-0603-zPMC PMC4803804
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11882-016-0603-z

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 Sequence identity matrix and 3D-models of allergenic protein families. a Ole e 1-like proteins and structure of Pla l 1.0101 (4Z8W), b pectate lyases and model of Amb a 1.0101 (template 1PXZ), and c lipid transfer proteins and model of Art v 3.0201 (template 2B5S). Multiple sequence alignments performed in Clustal Omega. Models were generated using Swiss-Model (www.swissmodel.expasy.org), and ribbon cartons are shown using UCSF Chimera (www.cgl.ucsf.edu/chimera). Green boxes represent demonstrated IgE cross-reactivity, light green boxes represent potential IgE cross-reactivity based on high sequence identity, red boxes represent no/limited demonstrated IgE cross-reactivity and light red boxes represent no/limited IgE cross-reactivity based on low sequence identity
Fig. 1 Sequence identity matrix and 3D-models of allergenic protein families. a Ole e 1-like proteins and structure of Pla l 1.0101 (4Z8W), b pectate lyases and model of Amb a 1.0101 (template 1PXZ), and c lipid transfer proteins and model of Art v 3.0201 (template 2B5S). Multiple sequence alignments performed in Clustal Omega. Models were generated using Swiss-Model (www.swissmodel.expasy.org), and ribbon cartons are shown using UCSF Chimera (www.cgl.ucsf.edu/chimera). Green boxes represent demonstrated IgE cross-reactivity, light green boxes represent potential IgE cross-reactivity based on high sequence identity, red boxes represent no/limited demonstrated IgE cross-reactivity and light red boxes represent no/limited IgE cross-reactivity based on low sequence identityCC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 102

  1. D'Amato G et al. Effects on asthma and respiratory allergy of climate change and air pollution. Multidiscip Respir Med. 2015;10:39. · DOI
  2. Fukuoka A et al. Diesel exhaust particles exacerbate allergic rhinitis in mice by disrupting the nasal epithelial barrier. Clin Exp Allergy. 2015. · DOI
  3. Wimmer M et al. Pollen-derived adenosine is a necessary cofactor for ragweed allergy. Allergy. 2015;70(8):944–54. · DOI
  4. Prado N et al. Pollensomes as natural vehicles for pollen allergens. J Immunol. 2015;195(2):445–9. · DOI
  5. Scevkova J et al. Influence of airborne pollen counts and length of pollen season of selected allergenic plants on the concentration of sIgE antibodies on the population of Bratislava, Slovakia. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2015;22(3):451–5. · DOI
  6. Newson RB et al. Geographical variation in the prevalence of sensitization to common aeroallergens in adults: the GA(2) LEN survey. Allergy. 2014;69(5):643–51. · DOI
  7. Panzner P et al. A comprehensive analysis of middle-European molecular sensitization profiles to pollen allergens. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2014;164(1):74–82. · DOI
  8. D'Amato G, Liccardi G. Pollen-related allergy in the European Mediterranean area. Clin Exp Allergy. 1994;24(3):210–9. · DOI
  9. Hauser M et al. Bet v 1-like pollen allergens of multiple Fagales species can sensitize atopic individuals. Clin Exp Allergy. 2011;41(12):1804–14. · DOI
  10. Asero R et al. Concomitant sensitization to ragweed and mugwort pollen: who is who in clinical allergy? Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2014;113(3):307–13. · DOI
  11. Ferreira F, Wolf M, Wallner M. Molecular approach to allergy diagnosis and therapy. Yonsei Med J. 2014;55(4):839–52. · DOI
  12. Himly M et al. Standardization of allergen products: 2. Detailed characterization of GMP-produced recombinant Phl p 5.0109 as European pharmacopoeia reference standard. Allergy. 2015. Extensive physico-chemcial and immunological characterization of Phl p 5 which is now available as European Pharmacopoeia allergen reference standard for grass pollen products. · DOI
  13. Niederberger V, Eckl-Dorna J, Pauli G. Recombinant allergen-based provocation testing. Methods. 2014;66(1):96–105. This paper reviews several important provocation methods and describes the earlier usage of allergen molecules in clinical provocation studies. · DOI
  14. Lupinek C et al. Advances in allergen-microarray technology for diagnosis and monitoring of allergy: the MeDALL allergen-chip. Methods. 2014;66(1):106–19. · DOI
  15. Khan FM et al. Basophil activation test compared to skin prick test and fluorescence enzyme immunoassay for aeroallergen-specific Immunoglobulin-E. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2012;8(1):1. · DOI
  16. Wong V et al. Early pollen sensitization in children is dependent upon regional aeroallergen exposure. J Allergy. 2012;2012:583765. · DOI
  17. Kleine-Tebbe J. Big-time sensitization rates in young Germans: big numbers—big risks—big confusion? Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2014;163(1):3–4. · DOI
  18. Vorontsova MS, Clayton D, Simon BK. Grassroots e-floras in the Poaceae: growing GrassBase and GrassWorld. PhytoKeys. 2015;48:73–84. · DOI
  19. Davies JM. Grass pollen allergens globally: the contribution of subtropical grasses to burden of allergic respiratory diseases. Clin Exp Allergy. 2014;44(6):790–801. · DOI
  20. Popescu FD. Molecular biomarkers for grass pollen immunotherapy. World J Methodol. 2014;4(1):26–45. This paper reviews the most important molecular biomarkers in grass pollen allergy to support accurate prescription for allergen immunotherapy. · DOI
  21. Darsow U et al. Allergens. Heterogeneity of molecular sensitization profiles in grass pollen allergy—implications for immunotherapy? Clin Exp Allergy. 2014;44(5):778–86. · DOI
  22. Scaparrotta A et al. Sensitization to timothy grass pollen allergenic molecules in children. Multidiscip Respir Med. 2013;8(1):17. · DOI
  23. Hatzler L et al. Molecular spreading and predictive value of preclinical IgE response to Phleum pratense in children with hay fever. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012;130(4):894–901. e5. Within this publication, the phenomenon “molecular spreading” which describes the sequential development of antibody response to non-cross-reacting molecules from the same source, starting with an initiator molecule was shown for grass pollen allergy. · DOI
  24. Campbell BC et al. Total transcriptome, proteome, and allergome of Johnson grass pollen, which is important for allergic rhinitis in subtropical regions. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015;135(1):133–42. This work demonstrated for the first time the presence of group II grass allergens in subtropical sources which until now were thought to be restricted to grasses of the temperate regions. · DOI
  25. Andersson K, Lidholm J. Characteristics and immunobiology of grass pollen allergens. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2003;130(2):87–107. · DOI
  26. Devanaboyina SC et al. High-resolution crystal structure and IgE recognition of the major grass pollen allergen Phl p 3. Allergy. 2014;69(12):1617–28. · DOI
  27. Nandy A et al. Primary structure, recombinant expression, and molecular characterization of Phl p 4, a major allergen of timothy grass (Phleum pratense). Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005;337(2):563–70. · DOI
  28. Asero R et al. Prevalence and clinical relevance of IgE sensitization to profilin in childhood: a multicenter study. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2015;168(1):25–31. · DOI
  29. Johansen N et al. Extensive IgE cross-reactivity towards the Pooideae grasses substantiated for a large number of grass-pollen-sensitized subjects. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2009;150(4):325–34. · DOI
  30. Timbrell VL et al. An immunodiagnostic assay for quantitation of specific IgE to the major pollen allergen component, Pas n 1, of the subtropical Bahia grass. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2014;165(4):219–28. This work showed improved sensitivity and specificity when using nPas n 1 for molecular diagnosis of Bahia grass pollen allergy and the authors suggested inclusion for routine molecular diagnosis as first allergen of the Panicoideae subfamily. · DOI
  31. Davies JM et al. Functional immunoglobulin E cross-reactivity between Pas n 1 of Bahia grass pollen and other group 1 grass pollen allergens. Clin Exp Allergy. 2011;41(2):281–91. · DOI
  32. Etto T et al. Unique and cross-reactive T cell epitope peptides of the major Bahia grass pollen allergen, Pas n 1. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2012;159(4):355–66. · DOI
  33. Marth K et al. Human monoclonal antibody-based quantification of group 2 grass pollen allergens. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004;113(3):470–4. · DOI
  34. Gschwantner T et al. Common tree definitions for national forest inventories in Europe. Silva Fennica. 2009;43(2):303–21. · DOI
  35. Asam C et al. Tree pollen allergens-an update from a molecular perspective. Allergy. 2015;70(10):1201–11. This comprehensive review provides an excellent description at the molecular level on all officially acknowledged tree pollen allergens. · DOI
  36. Burbach GJ et al. GA(2)LEN skin test study II: clinical relevance of inhalant allergen sensitizations in Europe. Allergy. 2009;64(10):1507–15. The study provides a comprehensive Europe-wide overview on allergic sensitization towards 18 inhalent allergens using skin prick tests. · DOI
  37. Campana R et al. Hypoallergenic derivatives of the major birch pollen allergen Bet v 1 obtained by rational sequence reassembly. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;126(5):1024–31. 1031 e1-8. · DOI
  38. Moverare R et al. Different IgE reactivity profiles in birch pollen-sensitive patients from six European populations revealed by recombinant allergens: an imprint of local sensitization. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2002;128(4):325–35. · DOI
  39. Sekerkova A, Polackova M. Detection of Bet v1, Bet v2 and Bet v4 specific IgE antibodies in the sera of children and adult patients allergic to birch pollen: evaluation of different IgE reactivity profiles depending on age and local sensitization. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2011;154(4):278–85. · DOI
  40. Geroldinger-Simic M et al. Birch pollen-related food allergy: clinical aspects and the role of allergen-specific IgE and IgG4 antibodies. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011;127(3):616–22. e1. · DOI
  41. Price A et al. Oral allergy syndrome (pollen-food allergy syndrome). Dermatitis. 2015;26(2):78–88. · DOI
  42. Rossi RE, Monasterolo G, Monasterolo S. Detection of specific IgE antibodies in the sera of patients allergic to birch pollen using recombinant allergens Bet v 1, Bet v 2, Bet v 4: evaluation of different IgE reactivity profiles. Allergy. 2003;58(9):929–32. · DOI
  43. Asturias JA et al. Purification and characterization of Pla a 1, a major allergen from Platanus acerifolia pollen. Allergy. 2002;57(3):221–7. · DOI
  44. Chen Z et al. Characterization of two pollen allergens of the London plane tree in Shanghai. Iran J Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2015;14(2):139–48.
  45. Ibarrola I et al. Identification of a polygalacturonase as a major allergen (Pla a 2) from Platanus acerifolia pollen. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004;113(6):1185–91. · DOI
  46. Pazouki N et al. Oriental plane pollen allergy: identification of allergens and cross-reactivity between relevant species. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2008;29(6):622–8. · DOI
  47. Lauer I et al. Identification of a plane pollen lipid transfer protein (Pla a 3) and its immunological relation to the peach lipid-transfer protein, Pru p 3. Clin Exp Allergy. 2007;37(2):261–9. · DOI
  48. Villalba M, Rodriguez R, Batanero E. The spectrum of olive pollen allergens. From structures to diagnosis and treatment. Methods. 2014;66(1):44–54. The paper reviews the current literature of olive pollen allergens including detailed description of sensitization prevalence towards individual allergenic molecules. · DOI
  49. Esteve C et al. Analysis of olive allergens. Talanta. 2012;92:1–14. · DOI
  50. Barderas R et al. Cloning, expression, and clinical significance of the major allergen from ash pollen, Fra e 1. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005;115(2):351–7. · DOI
  51. Imhof K et al. Ash pollen allergy: reliable detection of sensitization on the basis of IgE to Ole e 1. Allergo J Int. 2014;23(3):78–83. · DOI
  52. Torres M et al. An enzymatically active beta-1,3-glucanase from ash pollen with allergenic properties: a particular member in the oleaceae family. PLoS One. 2015;10(7), e0133066.
  53. Gonzalez E, Villalba M, Rodriguez R. Immunological and molecular characterization of the major allergens from lilac and privet pollens overproduced in Pichia pastoris. Clin Exp Allergy. 2001;31(2):313–21. · DOI
  54. Scala E et al. Cross-sectional survey on immunoglobulin E reactivity in 23,077 subjects using an allergenic molecule-based microarray detection system. Clin Exp Allergy. 2010;40(6):911–21. · DOI · Paper page
  55. Okamoto Y et al. Present situation of cedar pollinosis in Japan and its immune responses. Allergol Int. 2009;58(2):155–62. · DOI
  56. Yoshida K et al. Cedar and cypress pollen counts are associated with the prevalence of allergic diseases in Japanese schoolchildren. Allergy. 2013;68(6):757–63. · DOI
  57. Pettyjohn M, Levetin E. A comparative biochemical study of conifer pollen allergens. Aerobiologia. 1997;13:259–67. · DOI
  58. Mori T et al. Purification, identification, and cDNA cloning of Cha o 2, the second major allergen of Japanese cypress pollen. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1999;263(1):166–71. · DOI
  59. Yokoyama M et al. Purification, identification, and cDNA cloning of Jun a 2, the second major allergen of mountain cedar pollen. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2000;275(1):195–202. · DOI
  60. Stemeseder T et al. Marker allergens of weed pollen - basic considerations and diagnostic benefits in the clinical routine: part 16 of the series molecular allergology. Allergo J Int. 2014;23(8):274–80. · DOI
  61. Gadermaier G, Hauser M, Ferreira F. Allergens of weed pollen: an overview on recombinant and natural molecules. Methods. 2014;66(1):55–66. · DOI
  62. Villalba M et al. Amaranthaceae pollens: review of an emerging allergy in the mediterranean area. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2014;24(6):371–81. quiz 2 p preceding 382. An extensive overview on Amaranthaceae pollen allergens and their physicochemical and immunological properties is provided.
  63. Chan-Yeung M et al. Geographical variations in the prevalence of atopic sensitization in six study sites across Canada. Allergy. 2010;65(11):1404–13. · DOI
  64. Bousquet PJ et al. Geographical variation in the prevalence of positive skin tests to environmental aeroallergens in the European Community Respiratory Health Survey I. Allergy. 2007;62(3):301–9. · DOI
  65. Christensen LH et al. Short ragweeds is highly cross-reactive with other ragweeds. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2015;115(6):490–5. e1. · DOI
  66. Rueff F et al. Sensitization to common ragweed in southern Bavaria: clinical and geographical risk factors in atopic patients. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2012;159(1):65–74. · DOI
  67. Ziska L et al. Recent warming by latitude associated with increased length of ragweed pollen season in central North America. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(10):4248–51. · DOI
  68. Storkey J et al. A process-based approach to predicting the effect of climate change on the distribution of an invasive allergenic plant in Europe. PLoS One. 2014;9(2), e88156. · DOI
  69. Bordas-Le Floch V et al. Identification of novel short ragweed pollen allergens using combined transcriptomic and immunoproteomic approaches. PLoS One. 2015;10(8), e0136258. · DOI
  70. Pichler U et al. Pectate lyase pollen allergens: sensitization profiles and cross-reactivity pattern. PLoS One. 2015;10(5), e0120038. · DOI
  71. Jahn-Schmid B et al. Humoral and cellular cross-reactivity between Amb a 1, the major ragweed pollen allergen, and its mugwort homolog Art v 6. J Immunol. 2012;188(3):1559–67. · DOI
  72. Bouley J et al. Identification of the cysteine protease Amb a 11 as a novel major allergen from short ragweed. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015;136(4):1055–64. Within this work, the novel IgE reactive cysteine protease Amb a 11 was identified in ragweed pollen which shares similar physico-chemical properties with the dominant allergen Amb a 1. · DOI
  73. Leonard R et al. A new allergen from ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) with homology to art v 1 from mugwort. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(35):27192–200. · DOI
  74. Li J et al. A multicentre study assessing the prevalence of sensitizations in patients with asthma and/or rhinitis in China. Allergy. 2009. · DOI
  75. Himly M et al. Art v 1, the major allergen of mugwort pollen, is a modular glycoprotein with a defensin-like and a hydroxyproline-rich domain. Am Fasten J. 2003;17(1):106–8.
  76. Moverare R et al. Mugwort-sensitized individuals from North Europe, South Europe and North America show different IgE reactivity patterns. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2011;154(2):164–72. · DOI
  77. Egger M et al. The role of lipid transfer proteins in allergic diseases. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2010;10(5):326–35. · DOI
  78. Gao ZS et al. Peach allergy in China: a dominant role for mugwort pollen lipid transfer protein as a primary sensitizer. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013;131(1):224–6. e1-3. · DOI
  79. Sanchez-Lopez J et al. Role of Art v 3 in pollinosis of patients allergic to Pru p 3. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;133(4):1018–25. · DOI
  80. Scala E et al. Lipid transfer protein sensitization: reactivity profiles and clinical risk assessment in an Italian cohort. Allergy. 2015;70(8):933–43. Testing a large cohort of nsLTP patients revealed important association profiles and clusters and allowed drawing conclusions regarding clinical pictures. · DOI
  81. Ariano R, Canonica GW, Passalacqua G. Possible role of climate changes in variations in pollen seasons and allergic sensitizations during 27 years. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2010;104(3):215–22. · DOI
  82. Stumvoll S et al. Identification of cross-reactive and genuine Parietaria judaica pollen allergens. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003;111(5):974–9. · DOI
  83. Tordesillas L et al. Plant lipid transfer protein allergens: no cross-reactivity between those from foods and olive and Parietaria pollen. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2011;156(3):291–6. · DOI
  84. Gonzalez-Rioja R et al. Diagnosis of Parietaria judaica pollen allergy using natural and recombinant Par j 1 and Par j 2 allergens. Clin Exp Allergy. 2007;37(2):243–50. · DOI
  85. Gadermaier G et al. Plantago lanceolata: an important trigger of summer pollinosis with limited IgE cross-reactivity. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;134(2):472–5. e5. This is the first report about the high clinical relevance of English plantain pollen allergy in a cohort of the temperate climate. · DOI
  86. Sousa R et al. Identification of Plantago lanceolata pollen allergens using an immunoproteomic approach. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2014;24(3):177–83.
  87. Nouri HR et al. Diagnosis of Chenopodium album allergy with a cocktail of recombinant allergens as a tool for component-resolved diagnosis. Mol Biol Rep. 2012;39(3):3169–78. · DOI
  88. Farrokhi S et al. Common aeroallergens in patients with asthma and allergic rhinitis living in southwestern part of Iran: based on skin prick test reactivity. Iran J Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2015;14(2):133–8.
  89. Barber D et al. Understanding patient sensitization profiles in complex pollen areas: a molecular epidemiological study. Allergy. 2008;63(11):1550–8. · DOI
  90. Barber D et al. Component-resolved diagnosis of pollen allergy based on skin testing with profilin, polcalcin and lipid transfer protein pan-allergens. Clin Exp Allergy. 2009;39(11):1764–73. · DOI
  91. Barderas R et al. A pectin methylesterase as an allergenic marker for the sensitization to Russian thistle (Salsola kali) pollen. Clin Exp Allergy. 2007;37(7):1111–9. · DOI
  92. Cuesta-Herranz J et al. Differences among pollen-allergic patients with and without plant food allergy. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2010;153(2):182–92. · DOI
  93. Mas S et al. A recombinant Sal k 1 isoform as an alternative to the polymorphic allergen from Salsola kali pollen for allergy diagnosis. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2015;167(2):83–93. · DOI
  94. Castro L et al. Sal k 5, a member of the widespread Ole e 1-like protein family, is a new allergen of Russian thistle (Salsola kali) pollen. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2014;163(2):142–53. · DOI
  95. Barderas R et al. Identification and characterization of Che a 1 allergen from Chenopodium album pollen. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2002;127(1):47–54. · DOI
  96. Sirvent S et al. Pollen and plant food profilin allergens show equivalent IgE reactivity. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2011;106(5):429–35. · DOI
  97. Vallverdu A et al. Characterization of recombinant Mercurialis annua major allergen Mer a 1 (profilin). J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1998;101(3):363–70. · DOI
  98. Hauser M et al. Panallergens and their impact on the allergic patient. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2010;6(1):1. · DOI · Paper page
  99. Stringari G et al. The effect of component-resolved diagnosis on specific immunotherapy prescription in children with hay fever. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;134(1):75–81. This excellent work shows how molecule-based allergy diagnosis is directly impacting clinicians’ decision-making for immunotherapy. · DOI
  100. Asero R. Hypersensitivity to pollen panallergens (profilin and polcalcin) detected in vitro and in vivo: a comparative analysis. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2011;21(4):323–4.
  101. Hamilton RG, Kleine-Tebbe J. Molecular allergy diagnostics: analytical features that support clinical decisions. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2015;15(9):57. · DOI
  102. Canonica GW et al. Allergen immunotherapy (AIT): a prototype of precision medicine. World Allergy Organ J. 2015;8(1):31. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Pablos, I., Wildner, S., Asam, C., Wallner, M., & Gadermaier, G.
Venue
Current Allergy and Asthma Reports
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2016-03-22
Volume
16
Issue
4
ISSN
  • 1529-7322
  • 1534-6315
DOI
10.1007/s11882-016-0603-z
PMC
PMC4803804
Cited by
71
References
2
Language
en
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (unspecified)
Funders
  • Austrian Science Fund (I 1152, P27589 and L688)
  • Austrian Federal Ministry of Science, Research and Economy
  • National Foundation of Research, Technology and Development, Land Salzburg
  • Allergy-Cancer-BioNano Research Centre

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review