Cited by 136Cancer survivorship and careComplementary and Alternative Medicine StudiesMindfulness and Compassion Interventions

Mind-Body Therapies in Cancer: What Is the Latest Evidence?

Carlson, Linda E., Zelinski, Erin, Toivonen, Kirsti, Flynn, Michelle, Qureshi, Maryam, Piedalue, Katherine-Ann, Grant, Rachel·2017·Current Oncology Reports

Abstract

Purpose of review Many people living with cancer use complementary therapies, and some of the most popular are mind-body therapies (MBTs), including relaxation and imagery, hypnosis, yoga, meditation, tai chi and qigong, and art therapies. The efficacy of these modalities was reviewed by assessing recent findings in the context of cancer care. Recent findings These therapies show efficacy in treating common cancer-related side effects, including nausea and vomiting, pain, fatigue, anxiety, depressive symptoms and improving overall quality of life. Some also have effects on biomarkers such as immune function and stress hormones. Overall studies lack large sample sizes and active comparison groups. Common issues around clearly defining treatments including standardizing treatment components, dose, intensity, duration and training of providers make generalization across studies difficult. MBTs in cancer care show great promise and evidence of efficacy for treating many common symptoms. Future studies should investigate more diverse cancer populations using standardized treatment protocols and directly compare various MBTs to one another.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11912-017-0626-1

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A 2017 review reported improvements in QL, depression, and mood disturbance from art therapy for PLWC.

    “In a 2017 review, studies on art therapy for PLWC reported improvements in QL, depression, and mood disturbance (Carlson et al. 2017).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carlson, L. E., Zelinski, E., Toivonen, K., Flynn, M., Qureshi, M., Piedalue, K.-A., & Grant, R.
Affiliations
University of Calgary (CA)
Corresponding author
Carlson, Linda E.
Venue
Current Oncology Reports
Published
2017-08-18
Volume
19
Issue
10
Pages
67-67
ISSN
  • 1523-3790 (ISSN-L)
  • 1534-6269
OpenAlex
W2747197011
Cited by
136
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 13
FWCI
1.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Oncology Reports (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Keywords
mind-body interventions, complementary therapy, cancer, hypnosis, yoga, meditation, Tai Chi, qigong, art therapy, cancer symptoms, nausea and vomiting, pain, fatigue, anxiety, depressive symptoms, quality of life, immune function, stress hormones, treatment standardization
MeSH terms
Complementary Therapies, Anxiety, Humans, Hypnosis, Neoplasms, Quality of Life, Yoga, Meditation, Tai Ji

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review