Cited by 16Cancer survivorship and careChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of LifeResilience and Mental Health

A virtual resiliency program for lymphoma survivors: helping survivors cope with post-treatment challenges.

Open access
Perez, Giselle K., Walsh, Emily A., Quain, Kit, Abramson, Jeremy S., Park, Elyse R.·2021·Psychology & Health

Abstract

Objectives To adapt and test the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of an 8-week resiliency group program for posttreatment lymphoma survivors.Design and outcomes. This is an exploratory mixed methods study. Phase 1: We conducted qualitative interviews to inform program adaptation. Phase 2: Using a single-arm pilot design, we assessed program feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy (exploratory outcomes: stress coping, uncertainty intolerance, distress). We also examined the feasibility of collecting hair cortisol samples.Results. Phase 1: Survivors reported feeling socially isolated as they grappled with lingering symptoms that interfered with their return to normalcy. Fears about recurrence triggered bodily hypervigilance. Survivors desired wellness programs that 1) target their whole-body experience, 2) promote social connectedness, and 3) manage fear of recurrence. Phase 2: Thirty-seven survivors enrolled. Participants completed a median of 7/8 sessions, and 76.9% completed ≥6/8 sessions; 65% provided a hair sample. Survivors demonstrated improvements in stress coping (d = .67), uncertainty tolerance (d = .71), and anxiety (d = .41) at program completion.Conclusions. Findings suggest promising feasibility and efficacy of this program in addressing posttreatment survivorship challenges, particularly fears of uncertainty. A cancer care model that adopts early integration of this program posttreatment has the potential to improve survivors’ emotional, social and physical well-being.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08870446.2020.1849699

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Perez, G. K., Walsh, E. A., Quain, K., Abramson, J. S., & Park, E. R.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Miami (US)
  • Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Corresponding author
Perez, Giselle K.
Venue
Psychology & Health
Published
2020-11-28
Volume
36
Issue
11
Pages
1352-1367
ISSN
  • 0887-0446 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-8321
OpenAlex
W3106967474
Cited by
16
References
38
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9
FWCI
1.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychology and Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
American Cancer Society
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
Keywords
lymphoma survivors, resilience, group intervention, stress coping, intolerance of uncertainty, fear of recurrence, anxiety, hair cortisol, feasibility and acceptability, social isolation, hypervigilance, survivorship care
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Anxiety, Humans, Lymphoma, Pilot Projects, Quality of Life, Survivors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review