Cited by 26Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationMedication Adherence and ComplianceMigraine and Headache Studies

Enhancing Motivation for Change in the Management of Chronic Painful Conditions: a Review of Recent Literature

Ankawi, Brett, Kerns, Robert D., Edmond, Sara N.·2019·Current Pain and Headache Reports

Abstract

Purpose of review The purpose of this review is to evaluate and summarize recent empirical research investigating motivational factors for management of chronic pain and headache disorders.Recent findings Research on motivation for non-pharmacological treatment of chronic pain and headache disorders has identified factors that influence initiation of and adherence to treatment. To address common factors that inhibit initiation of treatment (i.e., cost, time commitment), several electronic treatments have been developed. Self-efficacy is the most commonly studied psychosocial influence on treatment adherence, with evidence that it is positively correlated with adherence. Other studies have sought to improve adherence to treatment using motivational interviewing interventions. There is currently limited research on how to enhance motivation for initial adherence to non-pharmacological treatment for chronic pain and headache disorders. Instead of enhancing motivation, researchers have looked to reduce barriers to treatment with electronic health treatments; however, many of these studies have focused on intervention feasibility, rather than efficacy or effectiveness. Numerous studies have identified a relationship between self-efficacy and treatment adherence. Although motivational interviewing interventions have been shown to improve adherence to treatment, there is little evidence that they improve treatment outcomes. Recommendations for further investigation include improving interventions to enhance accessibility and adherence to treatment with the goal of improving outcomes, as well as identifying ways to improve treatment initiation and adherence in patients who are currently engaged in long-term opioid therapy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11916-019-0813-x

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ankawi, B., Kerns, R. D., & Edmond, S. N.
Affiliations
  • VA Connecticut Healthcare System (US)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Ankawi, Brett
Venue
Current Pain and Headache Reports
Published
2019-08-06
Volume
23
Issue
10
Pages
75-75
ISSN
  • 1531-3433 (ISSN-L)
  • 1534-3081
OpenAlex
W2966248140
Cited by
26
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Pain and Headache Reports (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Migraine and Headache Studies
Keywords
chronic pain, headache disorders, medication adherence, treatment initiation, motivation, self-efficacy, motivational interviewing, digital health interventions, non-pharmacological treatment, barriers to treatment, opioid therapy
MeSH terms
Analgesics, Opioid, Humans, Time, Treatment Outcome, Chronic Pain, Motivational Interviewing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review