Cited by 101Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationDigital Mental Health InterventionsTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation

Interactive Voice Response–Based Self-management for Chronic Back Pain: The COPES Noninferiority Randomized Trial

Open access
Heapy, Alicia A., Higgins, Diana M., Goulet, Joseph L., LaChappelle, Kathryn M., Driscoll, Mary A., Czlapinski, Rebecca A., Buta, Eugenia, Piette, John D. +2 more·2017·JAMA Internal Medicine

Abstract

Importance: Recommendations for chronic pain treatment emphasize multimodal approaches, including nonpharmacologic interventions to enhance self-management. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is an evidence-based treatment that facilitates management of chronic pain and improves outcomes, but access barriers persist. Cognitive behavioral therapy delivery assisted by health technology can obviate the need for in-person visits, but the effectiveness of this alternative to standard therapy is unknown. The Cooperative Pain Education and Self-management (COPES) trial was a randomized, noninferiority trial comparing IVR-CBT to in-person CBT for patients with chronic back pain. Objective: To assess the efficacy of interactive voice response-based CBT (IVR-CBT) relative to in-person CBT for chronic back pain. Design, Setting, and Participants: We conducted a noninferiority randomized trial in 1 Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) health care system. A total of 125 patients with chronic back pain were equally allocated to IVR-CBT (n = 62) or in-person CBT (n = 63). Interventions: Patients treated with IVR-CBT received a self-help manual and weekly prerecorded therapist feedback based on their IVR-reported activity, coping skill practice, and pain outcomes. In-person CBT included weekly, individual CBT sessions with a therapist. Participants in both conditions received IVR monitoring of pain, sleep, activity levels, and pain coping skill practice during treatment. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was change from baseline to 3 months in unblinded patient report of average pain intensity measured by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Secondary outcomes included changes in pain-related interference, physical and emotional functioning, sleep quality, and quality of life at 3, 6, and 9 months. We also examined treatment retention. Results: Of the 125 patients (97 men, 28 women; mean [SD] age, 57.9 [11.6] years), the adjusted average reduction in NRS with IVR-CBT (-0.77) was similar to in-person CBT (-0.84), with the 95% CI for the difference between groups (-0.67 to 0.80) falling below the prespecified noninferiority margin of 1 indicating IVR-CBT is noninferior. Fifty-four patients randomized to IVR-CBT and 50 randomized to in-person CBT were included in the analysis of the primary outcome. Statistically significant improvements in physical functioning, sleep quality, and physical quality of life at 3 months relative to baseline occurred in both treatments, with no advantage for either treatment. Treatment dropout was lower in IVR-CBT with patients completing on average 2.3 (95% CI, 1.0-3.6) more sessions. Conclusions and Relevance: IVR-CBT is a low-burden alternative that can increase access to CBT for chronic pain and shows promise as a nonpharmacologic treatment option for chronic pain, with outcomes that are not inferior to in-person CBT. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01025752.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.0223

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 46 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Beck AT, Steer RA, Garbin MG. Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: 25 Years of Evaluation. Clin Psychol Rev. 1988;8(1): 77-100.
  2. Kazis LE. The veterans SF-36 health status questionnaire: development and application in the Veterans Health Administration. Monitor. 2000;5 (1):1-14.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heapy, A. A., Higgins, D. M., Goulet, J. L., LaChappelle, K. M., Driscoll, M. A., Czlapinski, R. A., Buta, E., Piette, J. D., Krein, S. L., & Kerns, R. D.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • Boston University (US)
  • VA Connecticut Healthcare System (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Heapy, Alicia A.
Venue
JAMA Internal Medicine
Published
2017-06-01
Volume
177
Issue
6
Pages
765
ISSN
2168-6106 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2604772958
Cited by
101
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3
FWCI
5.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Health Services Research and Development (#CIN 13-407)
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001863)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK092926)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Keywords
chronic back pain, interactive voice response, cognitive behavioral therapy, telemedicine, self-management, non-inferiority, pain intensity, sleep quality, physical function, quality of life, veterans, treatment retention, access to mental health care, Veterans Affairs health care, non-pharmacological pain management
MeSH terms
Simulation Training, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Education as Topic, Self Care, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Low Back Pain, Telemedicine, Chronic Pain, Pain Management, Early Medical Intervention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review