Cited by 365Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesTraumatic Brain Injury Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 84 of the 84 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Network-Based Neurobiological Model of PTSD: Evidence From Structural and Functional Neuroimaging Studies

Open access
Akiki, Teddy J., Averill, Christopher L., Abdallah, Chadi G.·2017·Current Psychiatry Reports

Abstract

Purpose of review Although a fine-grained understanding of the neurobiology of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is yet to be elucidated, the last two decades have seen a rapid growth in the study of PTSD using neuroimaging techniques. The current review summarizes important findings from functional and structural neuroimaging studies of PTSD, by primarily focusing on their relevance towards an emerging network-based neurobiological model of the disorder.Recent findings PTSD may be characterized by a weakly connected and hypoactive default mode network (DMN) and central executive network (CEN) that are putatively destabilized by an overactive and hyperconnected salience network (SN), which appears to have a low threshold for perceived saliency, and inefficient DMN-CEN modulation. There is considerable evidence for large-scale functional and structural network dysfunction in PTSD. Nevertheless, several limitations and gaps in the literature need to be addressed in future research.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11920-017-0840-4

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 84 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 364

Metadata

Authors
Akiki, T. J., Averill, C. L., & Abdallah, C. G.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Abdallah, Chadi G.
Venue
Current Psychiatry Reports
Published
2017-09-19
Volume
19
Issue
11
Pages
81-81
ISSN
  • 1523-3812 (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-1645
OpenAlex
W2756085351
Cited by
365
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 2
FWCI
3.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Psychiatry Reports (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Stanley Medical Research Institute
  • National Institutes of Health (5k23mh101498-05)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K23MH-101498()
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, neurobiological model, brain networks, default mode network, frontoparietal network, salience network, network dysfunction, functional connectivity, structural neuroimaging, functional neuroimaging
MeSH terms
Brain, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Models, Neurological, Nerve Net, Neurobiology, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Functional Neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review