The DOI matches its Crossref record; 300 of the 300 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Brief but Comprehensive Review of Research on the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
American Psychiatric Association (2013) · doi:10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596 · Cited by 116,369
Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452 · Cited by 15,744
Kotov, R., Krueger, R. F., Watson, D., Achenbach, T. M., Althoff, R. R., Bagby, R. M., Brown, T. A., Carpenter, W. T., Caspi, A., Clark, L. A., et al. (2017) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/abn0000258 · Cited by 3,335
Self-citationMMPI-2 : Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 : manual for administration and scoring
Hathaway, S. R., & McKinley, J. (1989) · University of Minnesota Press eBooks · Cited by 2,450
Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5
Krueger, R. F., Derringer, J., Markon, K. E., Watson, D., & Skodol, A. E. (2012) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291711002674 · Cited by 1,908
Self-citationA systematic review of personality trait change through intervention.
Roberts, B. W., Luo, J., Briley, D. A., Chow, P. I., Su, R., & Hill, P. L. (2017) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000088 · Cited by 1,047
Plate tectonics in the classification of personality disorder: Shifting to a dimensional model.
Widiger, T. A., & Trull, T. J. (2007) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.62.2.71 · Cited by 957
Classification, assessment, prevalence, and effect of personality disorder
Tyrer, P., Reed, G. M., & Crawford, M. J. (2015) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(14)61995-4 · Cited by 656
Bender, D. S., Morey, L. C., & Skodol, A. E. (2011) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1080/00223891.2011.583808 · Cited by 629
Krueger, R. F., & Markon, K. E. (2014) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153732 · Cited by 598
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 14
- Hengartner MP, Zimmermann J, Wright AGC. Personality pathology. In: Zeigler-Hill V, Shackelford T, editors. The SAGE handbook of personality and individual differences: volume III: applications of personality and individual differences. London: Sage; 2018. p. 3–35. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526451248.n1 . · doi:10.4135/9781526451248.n1
- Zimmermann J. Paradigmenwechsel in der Klassifikation von Persönlichkeitsstörungen: Die neuen Modelle in DSM-5 und ICD-11. Psychotherapie im Dialog. 2014;15:e1–e10. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1390426 . · doi:10.1055/s-0034-1390426
- Roche MJ. Examining the alternative model for personality disorder in daily life: evidence for incremental validity. Personal Disord. 2018;9:574–83. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000295 . · doi:10.1037/per0000295
- Lozovanu S, Moldovanu I, Vovc V, Ganenco A, Blajevschi A, Besleaga T. Translation and validation of the Russian version of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5). Moldovan Medical Journal. 2019;62:3–6. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.3233900 . · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3233900
- Liggett J, Sellbom M. Examining the DSM-5 alternative model of personality disorders operationalization of obsessive-compulsive personality disorder in a mental health sample. Personal Disord. 2018;9:397–407. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000285 . · doi:10.1037/per0000285
- Morey LC. Professional manual for the Personality Assessment Inventory. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources; 1991.
- Hopwood CJ, Mulay AL, Waugh MH, editors. The DSM-5 alternative model for personality disorders: integrating multiple paradigms of personality assessment. New York: Routledge; 2019.
- Bastiaens T, Claes L, Greiff S. Dimensional assessment of personality disorders. Eur J Psychol Assess. 2018;34:291–4. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000506 . · doi:10.1027/1015-5759/a000506
- Livesley JW, Jackson DN. Manual for the dimensional assessment of personality pathology-basic questionnaire. Port Huron: Sigma Press; 2009.
- Yalch MM, Hopwood CJ. Convergent, discriminant, and criterion validity of DSM-5 traits. Personal Disord. 2016;7:394–404. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000165 . · doi:10.1037/per0000165
- Wygant DB, Sellbom M, Sleep CE, Wall TD, Applegate KC, Krueger RF, et al. Examining the DSM-5 alternative personality disorder model operationalization of antisocial personality disorder and psychopathy in a male correctional sample. Personal Disord. 2016;7:229–39. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000179 . · doi:10.1037/per0000179
- Zimmermann J, Masuhr O, Jaeger U, Leising D, Benecke C, Spitzer C. Maladaptive Persönlichkeitseigenschaften gemäß DSM-5: Zusammenhänge mit psychischer Belastung und ICD-10 Diagnosen in einer klinischen Stichprobe. Persönlichkeitsstörungen: Theorie und Therapie. 2014;18:46–58.
- Fossati A, Borroni S, Somma A, Markon KE, Krueger RF. Testing relationships between DSM-5 section III maladaptive traits and measures of self and interpersonal impairment in Italian community dwelling adults. Personal Disord. 2017;8:275–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000192 . · doi:10.1037/per0000192
- Ro E, Nuzum H, Clark LA. Antagonism trait facets and comprehensive psychosocial disability: comparing information across self, informant, and interviewer reports. J Abnorm Psychol. 2017;126:890–7. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000298 . · doi:10.1037/abn0000298
Cited by
Bach, B., Kerber, A., Aluja, A., Bastiaens, T., Keeley, J. W., Claes, L., Fossati, A., Gutierrez, F., Oliveira, S. E. S., Pires, R., et al. (2020) · Psychopathology · doi:10.1159/000507589 · Cited by 204
Self-citationd’Huart, D., Steppan, M., Seker, S., Bürgin, D., Boonmann, C., Birkhölzer, M., Jenkel, N., Fegert, J. M., Schmid, M., & Schmeck, K. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2022.840678 · Cited by 35
Tanaka, M. (2024) · Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine · doi:10.17219/acem/197425 · Cited by 27
Steinberg, N., Moshe-Cohen, R., Sheena, L., & Kivity, Y. (2024) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-023-04963-w · Cited by 8
Kerber, A., Beintner, I., Burchert, S., & Knaevelsrud, C. (2021) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049688 · Cited by 7
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Zimmermann, J., Kerber, A., Rek, K., Hopwood, C. J., & Krueger, R. F.
- Venue
- Current Psychiatry Reports
- Published
- 2019-08-13
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 92-92
- ISSN
- 1523-3812 (ISSN-L)
- 1535-1645
- OpenAlex
- W2969205058
- Cited by
- 322
- References
- 300
- FWCI
- 37.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- www.springer.com/tdm (vor)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Brief but Comprehensive Review of Research on the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11920-019-1079-z
- The paper
- Zimmermann, J., Kerber, A., Rek, K., Hopwood, C. J., & Krueger, R. F. (2019). A Brief but Comprehensive Review of Research on the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders. Current Psychiatry Reports. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-019-1079-z
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
