Cited by 8Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyMental Health Research TopicsPersonality Traits and Psychology

Capturing a mentalized moment: A pilot study of the psychometric properties of a novel assessment method of mentalizing in daily life

Steinberg, Noa, Moshe-Cohen, Rotem, Sheena, Leeav, Kivity, Yogev·2024·Current Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12144-023-04963-w

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Steinberg, N., Moshe-Cohen, R., Sheena, L., & Kivity, Y.
Affiliations
Bar-Ilan University (IL)
Corresponding author
Kivity, Yogev
Venue
Current Psychology
Published
2023-07-14
Volume
43
Issue
8
Pages
7596-7611
ISSN
  • 1046-1310 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-4733
OpenAlex
W4384300597
Cited by
8
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2
FWCI
2.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Current Psychology (publishedVersion)
Funders
Israel Science Foundation (1345/20)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
mentalization, theory of mind, ecological momentary assessment, borderline personality disorder, within-person variability, stress, psychometric properties, inter-rater reliability, convergent validity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review