Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Medicine
Open accessAbstract
Purpose of review The ripples of artificial intelligence are being felt in various sectors of human life. Machine learning, a subset of artificial intelligence, extracts information from large databases of information and is gaining traction in various fields of cardiology. In this review, we highlight noteworthy examples of machine learning utilization in echocardiography, nuclear cardiology, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging over the past year. Recent findings In the past year, machine learning (ML) has expanded its boundaries in cardiology with several positive results. Some studies have integrated clinical and imaging information to further augment the accuracy of these ML algorithms. All the studies mentioned in this review have clearly demonstrated superior results of ML in relation to conventional approaches for identifying obstructions or predicting major adverse events in reference to conventional approaches. As the influx of data arriving from gradually evolving technologies in health care and wearable devices continues to be more complex, ML may serve as the bridge to transcend the gap between health care and patients in the future. In order to facilitate a seamless transition between both, a few issues must be resolved for a successful implementation of ML in health care.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
AI has been applied in various domains of healthcare including cancer research, cardiology, diabetes, mental health, identification of prognosis, Alzheimer's disease, identification of difference in clinical groups, cardiovascular disease, and stroke-related studies.
“AI has been put in application in various domains of healthcare [83–87] which includes cancer research [88], cardiology [89], diabetes [90], mental health [91], identification of prognosis [92], identification of Alzheimer's disease [93], identification of difference in the clinical groups [94], identification of cardiovascular disease [39], stroke-related studies [95], etc.”
From Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Big Data Analytics in m-Health: A Healthcare System Perspective (2020) · cites this paper as [84]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Human epicardial adipose tissue is a source of inflammatory mediators
Mazurek, T., Zhang, L., Zalewski, A., Mannion, J. D., Diehl, J. T., Arafat, H., Sarov-Blat, L., O’Brien, S., Keiper, E. A., Johnson, A. G., et al. (2003) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000099542.57313.c5 · Cited by 1,966 · see citing works
Miotto, R., Li, L., Kidd, B. A., & Dudley, J. T. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep26094 · Cited by 1,710 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence in cardiology
Johnson, K. W., Torres Soto, J., Glicksberg, B. S., Shameer, K., Miotto, R., Ali, M., Ashley, E., & Dudley, J. T. (2018) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2018.03.521 · Cited by 1,202 · see citing works
Zhang, J., Gajjala, S., Agrawal, P., Tison, G. H., Hallock, L. A., Beussink-Nelson, L., Lassen, M. H., Fan, E., Aras, M. A., Jordan, C., et al. (2018) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.118.034338 · Cited by 1,006 · see citing works
Mahabadi, A. A., Berg, M. H., Lehmann, N., Kälsch, H., Bauer, M., Kara, K., Dragano, N., Moebus, S., Jöckel, K.-H., Erbel, R., et al. (2013) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2012.11.062 · Cited by 529 · see citing works
Wolterink, J. M., Leiner, T., de Vos, B. D., van Hamersvelt, R. W., Viergever, M. A., & Išgum, I. (2016) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2016.04.004 · Cited by 321 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ahmed, Z., Mohamed, K., Zeeshan, S., & Dong, X. (2020) · Database · doi:10.1093/database/baaa010 · Cited by 1,035 · see citing works
khan, Z. F., & Alotaibi, S. R. (2020) · Journal of Healthcare Engineering · doi:10.1155/2020/8894694 · Cited by 235 · see citing works
- Authors
- Seetharam, K., Shrestha, S., & Sengupta, P. P.
- Affiliations
- West Virginia University (US)
- Venue
- Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine
- Published
- 2019-05
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 25-25
- ISSN
- 1092-8464 (ISSN-L)
- 1534-3189
- PMC
- PMC7561035
- OpenAlex
- W2946458538
- Cited by
- 76
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 6
- FWCI
- 0.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL133616)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (U54GM104942)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence, machine learning, echocardiography, nuclear cardiology, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, major adverse cardiovascular events, clinical decision support, wearable devices
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review