Cited by 88Migraine and Headache StudiesTemporomandibular Joint DisordersTraumatic Brain Injury Research

Nonpharmacologic Treatments for Migraine and Tension-Type Headache: How to Choose and When to Use

Nicholson, Robert A., Buse, Dawn C., Andrasik, Frank, Lipton, Richard B.·2011·Current Treatment Options in Neurology

Abstract

Opinion statement There are a variety of nonpharmacologic treatments for headache. Educating patients about headache and its management, identifying and managing triggers (via diaries), modifying lifestyles, and understanding the importance of adopting and adhering to interventions (either pharmacologic or nonpharmacologic) are relevant to all persons with headache. In addition, specific nonpharmacologic treatments can be used either alone or in conjunction with ongoing pharmacologic intervention. Strong candidates for nonpharmacologic treatment include individuals with significant headache-related disability, comorbid mood or anxiety disorders, difficulty managing stress or other triggers, medication overuse, and patients who prefer a specific treatment. Behavioral treatments (relaxation, biofeedback, and cognitive-behavioral therapy) possess the most evidence for successful headache management. They have a long history of randomized trials showing efficacy and are considered first-line preventive options. Among complementary and alternative treatments, recent positive findings from randomized trials using acupuncture provide evidence of its potential as a first-line intervention. Other complementary and alternative techniques do not have a consistent base of research to recommend them for headache prevention, but they may be used if the patient prefers this approach or when other first-line interventions (nonpharmacologic or pharmacologic) have not provided adequate results. Among "natural" treatments, both butterbur extract and vitamin B2 have shown efficacy in more than one randomized trial and are thus potentially useful first-line preventive interventions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11940-010-0102-9

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

2 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nicholson, R. A., Buse, D. C., Andrasik, F., & Lipton, R. B.
Affiliations
  • Saint Louis University (US)
  • Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US)
  • University of Memphis (US)
Corresponding author
Nicholson, Robert A.
Venue
Current Treatment Options in Neurology
Published
2010-11-16
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
28-40
ISSN
  • 1092-8480 (ISSN-L)
  • 1534-3138
OpenAlex
W2079068522
Cited by
88
References
50
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 11
FWCI
5.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Treatment Options in Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Migraine and Headache Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Complementary and Manual Therapy › Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Keywords
migraine, tension-type headache, non-pharmacological treatment, headache prevention, behavior therapy, biofeedback, relaxation training, cognitive behavioral therapy, acupuncture, complementary and alternative medicine, riboflavin, medication overuse headache, headache triggers, lifestyle modification, patient education, medication adherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review