Cited by 37Migraine and Headache StudiesTemporomandibular Joint DisordersTraumatic Brain Injury Research

An update on behavioral treatments in migraine - current knowledge and future options

Kropp, Peter, Meyer, Bianca, Meyer, Wolfgang, Dresler, Thomas·2017·Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Besides pharmacological and interventional treatments a variety of non-medical therapeutic options exist for migraine, which has largely been derived from behavioral therapy. Areas covered: For our update we collected available studies via PubMed searches. This review highlights that already consulting of the patient is able to reduce the frequency of migraine attacks. Relaxation techniques, especially progressive muscle relaxation, and various types of biofeedback are effective, as is the implementation of cognitive behavioral therapy. However, recent reviews also point to some existing inconsistencies and methodological limitations. The advent of modern information technology based approaches (e.g. online therapy, smartphone applications) further advanced the arsenal of behavioral treatment regimes. The combination of behavioral treatment options and the combination with pharmacotherapy lead to additive effects. In modern multidisciplinary treatment approaches, behavioral therapy is an indispensable component. Expert commentary: Behavioral treatment in prophylaxis of migraine is as effective as pharmacological treatment with additional effects when pharmacological and behavioral treatment is applied in combination. Novel treatment approaches using online technology and electronic devices offer interesting options that will spread more in the future.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14737175.2017.1377611

Cites

95 of 95 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 96 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kropp, P., Meyer, B., Meyer, W., & Dresler, T.
Affiliations
  • Universitätsmedizin Rostock (DE)
  • Queen Mary University of London (GB)
  • Universitätsklinikum Tübingen (DE)
Corresponding author
Kropp, Peter
Venue
Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics
Published
2017-09-19
Volume
17
Issue
11
Pages
1059-1068
ISSN
  • 1473-7175 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-8360
OpenAlex
W2751609836
Cited by
37
References
96
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Migraine and Headache Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Complementary and Manual Therapy › Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Keywords
migraine, behavior therapy, migraine prophylaxis, relaxation techniques, progressive muscle relaxation, biofeedback, cognitive behavioral therapy, mobile application, online therapy, multidisciplinary treatment
MeSH terms
Behavior Therapy, Biofeedback, Psychology, Combined Modality Therapy, Exercise Therapy, Humans, Migraine Disorders, Relaxation Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review