Cited by 32Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical InnovationsMental Health and PsychiatryCybernetics and Technology in Society

Correcting the Brain? The Convergence of Neuroscience, Neurotechnology, Psychiatry, and Artificial Intelligence

Open access
Rainey, Stephen, Erden, Yasemin J.·2020·Science and Engineering Ethics

Abstract

The incorporation of neural-based technologies into psychiatry offers novel means to use neural data in patient assessment and clinical diagnosis. However, an over-optimistic technologisation of neuroscientifically-informed psychiatry risks the conflation of technological and psychological norms. Neurotechnologies promise fast, efficient, broad psychiatric insights not readily available through conventional observation of patients. Recording and processing brain signals provides information from ‘beneath the skull’ that can be interpreted as an account of neural processing and that can provide a basis to evaluate general behaviour and functioning. But it ought not to be forgotten that the use of such technologies is part of a human practice of neuroscience informed psychiatry. This paper notes some challenges in the integration of neural technologies into psychiatry and suggests vigilance particularly in respect to normative challenges. In this way, psychiatry can avoid a drift toward reductive technological approaches, while nonetheless benefitting from promising advances in neuroscience and technology.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11948-020-00240-2

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Considerable improvements are required in neurodata acquisition/analysis, standardization of methods, feasibility and accessibility of neurodevices, size and diversity of neuro datasets, and validation of existing results before neurotechnologies can be reliably or ethically implemented.

    “For instance, considerable improvements are required in terms of the ease and speed of acquisition and analysis of neurodata (for future scalability), the standardization of methods, the feasibility and accessibility of neurodevices (for example, to make them more intuitive, less cumbersome, more affordable, and more adaptable to differences across human bodies), the size and diversity of neuro”

    From AI and Neurotechnology (2023) · cites this paper as [30]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Neurodata is often produced and curated within Western European origins.

    “neurodata is often produced and curated within Western European origins. 30”

    From AI and Neurotechnology (2023) · cites this paper as [30]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. Ashrafian H Can artificial intelligences suffer from mental illness? A philosophical matter to consider Science and Engineering Ethics 2017 23 2 403 412 10.1007/s11948-016-9783-0 27351772 PMC5364237 · DOI
  2. Bench-Capon TJM Dunne PE Argumentation in artificial intelligence Artificial Intelligence 2007 171 10–15 619 641 10.1016/j.artint.2007.05.001 · DOI
  3. Bzdok D Meyer-Lindenberg A Machine learning for precision psychiatry: Opportunities and challenges Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging 2018 3 3 223 230 29486863
  4. Chiao JY Cheon BK Choudhury S Slaby J Cultural neuroscience as critical neuroscience in practice’ Critical neuroscience: A handbook of the social and cultural contexts of neuroscience 2016 Oxford Wiley 287 304
  5. Churchland PS Neurophilosophy toward a unified science of the mind brain 1989 Cambridge, MA MIT Press
  6. Cohn S Choudhury S Slaby J Disrupting images: Neuroscientific representations in the lives of psychiatric patients Critical neuroscience: A handbook of the social and cultural contexts of neuroscience 2016 Oxford Wiley 179 194
  7. Dumit J Choudhury S Slaby J Critically producing brain images of mind Critical neuroscience: A handbook of the social and cultural contexts of neuroscience 2016 Oxford Wiley 195 226
  8. Dwyer DB Falkai P Koutsouleris N Machine learning approaches for clinical psychology and psychiatry Annual Review of Clinical Psychology 2018 14 91 118 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032816-045037 29401044 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Fang JY Tolleson C The role of deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease: An overview and update on new developments Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2017 13 March 723 732 10.2147/NDT.S113998 28331322 PMC5349504 · DOI
  10. Gilbert F Goddard E Viaña JNM Carter A Horne M I miss being me: Phenomenological effects of deep brain stimulation AJOB Neuroscience 2017 8 2 96 109 10.1080/21507740.2017.1320319 · DOI
  11. Gitelman L ‘Raw data’ is an oxymoron. Cambridge, Massachusetts; London 2013 Cambridge The MIT Press
  12. Glannon W Ethical issues in neuroprosthetics Journal of Neural Engineering 2016 13 2 021002 10.1088/1741-2560/13/2/021002 26859756 · DOI
  13. Glaser, J. I., Chowdhury, R. H., Perich, M. G., Miller, L. E., & Kording, K. P. (2017). Machine learning for neural decoding. arXiv:1708.00909 [Cs, q-Bio, Stat], August. http://arxiv.org/abs/1708.00909. PMC7470933 32737181 · arXiv
  14. Goering S Klein E Dougherty DD Widge AS Staying in the loop: Relational agency and identity in next-generation DBS for psychiatry AJOB Neuroscience 2017 8 2 59 70 10.1080/21507740.2017.1320320 · DOI
  15. Grace, K., Salvatier, J., Dafoe, A., Zhang, B., & Evans, O. (2017). When will AI exceed human performance? Evidence from AI experts, May. https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.08807. · arXiv
  16. Hart A Wyatt J Evaluating black-boxes as medical decision aids: Issues arising from a study of neural networks Medical Informatics 1990 15 3 229 236 10.3109/14639239009025270 2232958 · DOI
  17. Haselager P Mecacci G Donnelly-Lazarov B Is brain reading mind reading? Neurolaw and responsibility for action 2018 Cambridge Cambridge University Press 182 192
  18. Henrich J Heine SJ Norenzayan A The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2010 33 2–3 61 83 10.1017/S0140525X0999152X 20550733 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Hofmann B Technological paternalism: On how medicine has reformed ethics and how technology can refine moral theory Science and Engineering Ethics 2003 9 3 343 352 10.1007/s11948-003-0031-z 12971295 · DOI
  20. Iniesta R Stahl D McGuffin P Machine learning, statistical learning and the future of biological research in psychiatry Psychological Medicine 2016 46 12 2455 2465 10.1017/S0033291716001367 27406289 PMC4988262 · DOI
  21. Insel TR Quirion R Psychiatry as a clinical neuroscience discipline JAMA, the Journal of the American Medical Association 2005 294 17 2221 2224 10.1001/jama.294.17.2221 16264165 PMC1586100 · DOI
  22. Johnston C Liddle J The Mental Capacity Act 2005: A new framework for healthcare decision making Journal of Medical Ethics 2007 33 2 94 97 10.1136/jme.2006.016972 17264196 PMC2598235 · DOI
  23. Kellmeyer P Big brain data: On the responsible use of brain data from clinical and consumer-directed neurotechnological devices Neuroethics 2018 10.1007/s12152-018-9371-x · DOI
  24. Kirmayer LJ Gold I Choudhury S Slaby J Re-socializing psychiatry: Critical neuroscience and the limits of reductionism Critical neuroscience: A handbook of the social and cultural contexts of neuroscience 2011 Oxford Wiley 305 330
  25. Kitchin R Big data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts Big Data & Society 2014 1 1 1 12 10.1177/2053951714528481 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Klaming L Haselager P Did my brain implant make me do it? Questions raised by DBS regarding psychological continuity, responsibility for action and mental competence’ Neuroethics 2013 6 3 527 539 10.1007/s12152-010-9093-1 24273622 PMC3825573 · DOI
  27. Klein E Goering S Gagne J Shea CV Franklin R Zorowitz S Dougherty DD Widge AS Brain-computer interface-based control of closed-loop brain stimulation: Attitudes and ethical considerations Brain-Computer Interfaces 2016 3 3 140 148 10.1080/2326263X.2016.1207497 · DOI
  28. Korsgaard CM Kant: Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals 2012 Cambridge Cambridge University Press
  29. Maslen H Pugh J Savulescu J The ethics of deep brain stimulation for the treatment of anorexia nervosa Neuroethics 2015 8 3 215 230 10.1007/s12152-015-9240-9 26594256 PMC4643100 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Parastarfeizabadi M Kouzani AZ Advances in closed-loop deep brain stimulation devices Journal of Neuro Engineering and Rehabilitation 2017 10.1186/s12984-017-0295-1 PMC5553781 28800738 · DOI
  31. Pugh J Pycroft L Maslen H Aziz T Savulescu J Evidence-based neuroethics, deep brain stimulation and personality - Deflating, but not bursting, the bubble Neuroethics 2018 10.1007/s12152-018-9392-5 PMC8568854 34790274 · DOI
  32. Rainey S “A steadying hand”: Ascribing speech acts to users of predictive speech assistive technologies Journal of Law and Medicine 2018 26 1 44 53 30302972
  33. Ramesh AN Kambhampati C Monson JRT Drew PJ Artificial intelligence in medicine Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England 2004 86 5 334 338 10.1308/147870804290 15333167 PMC1964229 · DOI
  34. Roelfsema PR Denys D Klink PC Mind reading and writing: The future of neurotechnology Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2018 22 7 598 610 10.1016/j.tics.2018.04.001 29729902 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Rose N Reading the human brain: How the mind became legible Body & Society 2016 22 2 140 177 10.1177/1357034X15623363 · DOI
  36. Rose S Choudhury S Slaby J The need for a critical neuroscience: from neuroideology to neurotechnology Critical neuroscience: A handbook of the social and cultural contexts of neuroscience 2016 Oxford Wiley 53 66
  37. Rose N Abi-Rached J Governing through the brain: Neuropolitics, neuroscience and subjectivity The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology 2014 32 1 3 23 10.3167/ca.2014.320102 · DOI
  38. Silvanto J Muggleton N Walsh V State-dependency in brain stimulation studies of perception and cognition Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2008 12 12 447 454 10.1016/j.tics.2008.09.004 18951833 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Silver D Huang A Maddison CJ Guez A Sifre L van den Driessche G Schrittwieser J Mastering the game of go with deep neural networks and tree search’ Nature 2016 529 7587 484 489 10.1038/nature16961 26819042 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Tamburrini G Brain to computer communication: Ethical perspectives on interaction models Neuroethics 2009 2 3 137 149 10.1007/s12152-009-9040-1 · DOI
  41. Temel Y Kessels A Tan S Topdag A Boon P Visser-Vandewalle V Behavioural changes after bilateral subthalamic stimulation in advanced Parkinson disease: A systematic review Parkinsonism & Related Disorders 2006 12 5 265 272 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2006.01.004 16621661 · DOI
  42. Thompson AGH The meaning of patient involvement and participation in health care consultations: A taxonomy Social Science and Medicine 2007 64 6 1297 1310 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.11.002 17174016 · DOI
  43. Widge AS Sahay A Closing the loop in deep brain stimulation for psychiatric disorders: Lessons from motor neural prosthetics Neuropsychopharmacology 2016 41 1 379 380 10.1038/npp.2015.241 26657958 PMC4677134 · DOI
  44. Wittgenstein L Philosophical investigations 2009 Oxford Wiley
  45. Xu R Jiang N Lin C Mrachacz-Kersting N Dremstrup K Farina D Enhanced low-latency detection of motor intention from EEG for closed-loop brain-computer interface applications IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 2014 61 2 288 296 10.1109/TBME.2013.2294203 24448593 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rainey, S., & Erden, Y. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • St Mary's University Twickenham London (GB)
Corresponding author
Rainey, Stephen
Venue
Science and Engineering Ethics
Published
2020-07-06
Volume
26
Issue
5
Pages
2439-2454
ISSN
  • 1353-3452 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-5546
OpenAlex
W3040040721
Cited by
32
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3
FWCI
2.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science and Engineering Ethics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • St Mary's University Repository (ULCC) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (732032)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Cybernetics and Technology in Society
Keywords
neurotechnology, psychiatry, artificial intelligence, diagnosis, normative questions, reductionism
MeSH terms
Artificial Intelligence, Brain, Humans, Neurosciences, Psychiatry, Technology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review