Cited by 966Artificial Intelligence in HealthcareMachine Learning in HealthcareMental Health Research Topics

Machine Learning Approaches for Clinical Psychology and Psychiatry

Dwyer, Dominic B., Falkai, Peter, Koutsouleris, Nikolaos·2018·Annual Review of Clinical Psychology

Abstract

Machine learning approaches for clinical psychology and psychiatry explicitly focus on learning statistical functions from multidimensional data sets to make generalizable predictions about individuals. The goal of this review is to provide an accessible understanding of why this approach is important for future practice given its potential to augment decisions associated with the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of people suffering from mental illness using clinical and biological data. To this end, the limitations of current statistical paradigms in mental health research are critiqued, and an introduction is provided to critical machine learning methods used in clinical studies. A selective literature review is then presented aiming to reinforce the usefulness of machine learning methods and provide evidence of their potential. In the context of promising initial results, the current limitations of machine learning approaches are addressed, and considerations for future clinical translation are outlined.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032816-045037

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Multimodal and intensive sampling data streams might be particularly promising inputs for machine learning models because these models can often handle many correlated predictors.

    “Multimodal and intensive sampling data streams (for example, experience sampling and passive measures gathered through smartphones and other electronic devices) used in some MBI studies133 and mental health research broadly134,135 might be particularly promising inputs for machine learning models, given that these models can often handle many correlated predictors136.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dwyer, D. B., Falkai, P., & Koutsouleris, N.
Affiliations
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Venue
Annual Review of Clinical Psychology
Published
2018-05-07
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
91-118
ISSN
  • 1548-5943 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-5951
OpenAlex
W2787427645
Cited by
966
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 124 · 2025: 172 · 2024: 142 · 2023: 103 · 2022: 135 · 2021: 118 · 2020: 113 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 13
FWCI
13.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annual Review of Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
machine learning, clinical psychology, psychiatry, mental illness, diagnosis, prognosis, treatment prediction, clinical data, biological data, statistical limitations, clinical translation, prediction model
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Mental Disorders, Humans, Psychiatry, Psychology, Clinical, Precision Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review