The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Methods for Assessing Bone Quality: A Review
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Bone mass, geometry, and tissue material properties contribute to bone structural integrity. Thus, bone strength arises from both bone quantity and quality. Bone quality encompasses the geometric and material factors that contribute to fracture resistance. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: This review presents an overview of the methods for assessing bone quality across multiple length scales, their outcomes, and their relative advantages and disadvantages. METHODS: A PubMed search was conducted to identify methods related to bone mechanical testing, imaging, and compositional analysis. Using various exclusion criteria, articles were selected for inclusion. RESULTS: Methods for assessing mechanical properties include whole-bone, bulk tissue, microbeam, and micro- and nanoindentation testing techniques. Outcomes include structural strength and material modulus. Advantages include direct assessment of bone strength; disadvantages include specimen destruction during testing. Methods for characterizing bone geometry and microarchitecture include quantitative CT, high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT, high-resolution MRI, and micro-CT. Outcomes include three-dimensional whole-bone geometry, trabecular morphology, and tissue mineral density. The primary advantage is the ability to image noninvasively; disadvantages include the lack of a direct measure of bone strength. Methods for measuring tissue composition include scanning electron microscopy, vibrational spectroscopy, nuclear magnetic resonance imaging, and chemical and physical analytical techniques. Outcomes include mineral density and crystallinity, elemental composition, and collagen crosslink composition. Advantages include the detailed material characterization; disadvantages include the need for a biopsy. CONCLUSIONS: Although no single method can completely characterize bone quality, current noninvasive imaging techniques can be combined with ex vivo mechanical and compositional techniques to provide a comprehensive understanding of bone quality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Basic biomechanical measurements of bone: A tutorial
Turner, C. H., & Burr, D. B. (1993) · Bone · doi:10.1016/8756-3282(93)90081-k · Cited by 1,666
Dependence of yield strain of human trabecular bone on anatomic site
Morgan, E. F., & Keaveny, T. M. (2001) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/s0021-9290(01)00011-2 · Cited by 705
Lane, N. E., Yao, W., Balooch, M., Nalla, R. K., Balooch, G., Habelitz, S., Kinney, J. H., & Bonewald, L. F. (2006) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1359/jbmr.051103 · Cited by 355
Keaveny, T. M., Wachtel, E. F., Ford, C. M., & Hayes, W. C. (1994) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/0021-9290(94)90054-x · Cited by 330
The mechanical properties of human tibial trabecular bone as a function of metaphyseal location
Goldstein, S. A., Wilson, D. L., Sonstegard, D. A., & Matthews, L. S. (1983) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/0021-9290(83)90097-0 · Cited by 292 · cited 2×
“Investigations involving an animal model or cadaveric specimens allow for direct assessment of bone strength with destructive mechanical testing [12, 33, 60, 61].”
Cited by
Lambers, F. M., Bouman, A. R., Tkachenko, E. V., Keaveny, T. M., & Hernandez, C. J. (2014) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.10.011 · Cited by 36
Moderate chronic kidney disease impairs bone quality in C57Bl/6J mice
Heveran, C. M., Ortega, A. M., Cureton, A., Clark, R., Livingston, E. W., Bateman, T. A., Levi, M., King, K. B., & Ferguson, V. L. (2016) · Bone · doi:10.1016/j.bone.2016.02.006 · Cited by 25
Tsuji, K., Kitamura, M., Chiba, K., Muta, K., Yokota, K., Okazaki, N., Osaki, M., Mukae, H., & Nishino, T. (2022) · Renal Failure · doi:10.1080/0886022x.2022.2043375 · Cited by 16
Association of Energy, Macronutrients, and Fiber Intakes with Bone Health in Adolescent Athletes
Miranda, C. C., de Araújo Pinto, A., de Lima, T. R., Bim, M. A., Fernandes, R. A., & Pelegrini, A. (2025) · Calcified Tissue International · doi:10.1007/s00223-025-01430-5 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Donnelly, E.
- Venue
- Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
- Published
- 2011-08
- Volume
- 469
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2128-2138
- ISSN
- 0009-921X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1963966569
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 7.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Methods for Assessing Bone Quality: A Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11999-010-1702-0
- The paper
- Donnelly, E. (2011). Methods for Assessing Bone Quality: A Review. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1702-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.