Cited by 292Bone health and osteoporosis researchBone fractures and treatmentsOrthopaedic implants and arthroplasty

The mechanical properties of human tibial trabecular bone as a function of metaphyseal location

Goldstein, Steven A., Wilson, Douglas L., Sonstegard, David A., Matthews, Larry S.·1983·Journal of Biomechanics

Abstract

Experimental determination of the elastic modulus and ultimate strength of human tibial trabecular bone as a function of metaphyseal location is presented. A 1 cm cubic matrix with planes parallel to the subchondral plate was defined on five fresh frozen cadaver tibias. Approximately 400, 7 mm X 10 mm cylindrical bone plugs were cut from the locations defined by the matrix and tested in uniaxial compressive stress at a strain rate of 0.1%S-1. Results of the study indicate that the trabecular bone properties vary as much as two orders of magnitude from one location to another. As might be predicted from Wolff's law, and noted by previous investigators, concentrations of strength arise from the medial and lateral metaphyseal cortices toward the major medial and lateral contact regions. These results may be valuable for improved analytical modeling and optimal prosthetic design.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0021-9290(83)90097-0

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Young's modulus can vary by as much as 100-fold within a single epiphysis.

    “Young’s modulus can vary by as much as 100-fold, and strength as much as fivefold, within a single epiphysis (88).”

    From Bone Mechanical Properties in Healthy and Diseased States (2018) · cites this paper as [88]

  • Strength can vary as much as fivefold within a single epiphysis.

    “Young’s modulus can vary by as much as 100-fold, and strength as much as fivefold, within a single epiphysis (88).”

    From Bone Mechanical Properties in Healthy and Diseased States (2018) · cites this paper as [88]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goldstein, S. A., Wilson, D. L., Sonstegard, D. A., & Matthews, L. S.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Venue
Journal of Biomechanics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1983-01
Volume
16
Issue
12
Pages
965-969
ISSN
0021-9290 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2038929699
Cited by
292
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 6
FWCI
13.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Biomechanics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Bone fractures and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
Keywords
trabecular bone, tibia, elastic modulus, ultimate strength, uniaxial compression, bone mechanical properties, Wolff's law, cortical bone, bone plug, prosthesis design
MeSH terms
Aged, Biomechanical Phenomena, Cadaver, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Stress, Mechanical, Tibia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review