Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 241

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Technical Assessment of the Utility of Reverse Phase Protein Arrays for the Study of the Functional Proteome in Non-microdissected Human Breast Cancers

Open access
Hennessy, Bryan T., Lu, Yiling, Gonzalez-Angulo, Ana Maria, Carey, Mark S., Myhre, Simen, Ju, Zhenlin, Davies, Michael A., Liu, Wenbin, Coombes, Kevin, Meric-Bernstam, Funda, Bedrosian, Isabelle, McGahren, Mollianne, Agarwal, Roshan, Zhang, Fan, Overgaard, Jens, Alsner, Jan, Neve, Richard M., Kuo, Wen-Lin, Gray, Joe W., Borresen-Dale, Anne-Lise, Mills, Gordon B.·2010·Clinical Proteomics

Abstract

Introduction: The lack of large panels of validated antibodies, tissue handling variability, and intratumoral heterogeneity potentially hamper comprehensive study of the functional proteome in non-microdissected solid tumors. The purpose of this study was to address these concerns and to demonstrate clinical utility for the functional analysis of proteins in non-microdissected breast tumors using reverse phase protein arrays (RPPA). Methods: Herein, 82 antibodies that recognize kinase and steroid signaling proteins and effectors were validated for RPPA. Intraslide and interslide coefficients of variability were <15%. Multiple sites in non-microdissected breast tumors were analyzed using RPPA after intervals of up to 24 h on the benchtop at room temperature following surgical resection. Results: Twenty-one of 82 total and phosphoproteins demonstrated time-dependent instability at room temperature with most variability occurring at later time points between 6 and 24 h. However, the 82-protein functional proteomic “fingerprint” was robust in most tumors even when maintained at room temperature for 24 h before freezing. In repeat samples from each tumor, intratumoral protein levels were markedly less variable than intertumoral levels. Indeed, an independent analysis of prognostic biomarkers in tissue from multiple tumor sites accurately and reproducibly predicted patient outcomes. Significant correlations were observed between RPPA and immunohistochemistry. However, RPPA demonstrated a superior dynamic range. Classification of 128 breast cancers using RPPA identified six subgroups with markedly different patient outcomes that demonstrated a significant correlation with breast cancer subtypes identified by transcriptional profiling. Conclusion: Thus, the robustness of RPPA and stability of the functional proteomic “fingerprint” facilitate the study of the functional proteome in non-microdissected breast tumors.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12014-010-9055-y

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 241

Metadata

Authors
Hennessy, B. T., Lu, Y., Gonzalez-Angulo, A. M., Carey, M. S., Myhre, S., Ju, Z., Davies, M. A., Liu, W., Coombes, K., Meric-Bernstam, F., Bedrosian, I., McGahren, M., Agarwal, R., Zhang, F., Overgaard, J., Alsner, J., Neve, R. M., Kuo, W.-L., Gray, J. W., Borresen-Dale, A.-L., & Mills, G. B.
Venue
Clinical Proteomics
Published
2010-10-23
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pages
129-151
ISSN
  • 1542-6416 (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-0275
OpenAlex
W2029281176
Cited by
241
References
4
FWCI
4.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Technical Assessment of the Utility of Reverse Phase Protein Arrays for the Study of the Functional Proteome in Non-microdissected Human Breast Cancers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s12014-010-9055-y
The paper
Hennessy, B. T., Lu, Y., Gonzalez-Angulo, A. M., Carey, M. S., Myhre, S., Ju, Z., Davies, M. A., Liu, W., Coombes, K., Meric-Bernstam, F., Bedrosian, I., McGahren, M., Agarwal, R., Zhang, F., Overgaard, J., Alsner, J., Neve, R. M., Kuo, W.-L., Gray, J. W., . . . Mills, G. B. (2010). A Technical Assessment of the Utility of Reverse Phase Protein Arrays for the Study of the Functional Proteome in Non-microdissected Human Breast Cancers. Clinical Proteomics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12014-010-9055-y

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.