Real-World safety, patient-reported outcomes, and glycemic metrics with a 7-Day extended infusion set in adults with Type 1 diabetes using automated insulin delivery systems
Open accessAbstract
Background: Extended-wear infusion sets (E-iS) allowing up to 7 days of catheter use have recently become available. Real-world evidence of contemporary automated insulin delivery (AID) systems using E-iS remains limited. Method: A prospective non-randomized single-arm real-world study in adults with type 1 diabetes using the MiniMed-780G AID system who transitioned from conventional 3-day infusion sets to E-iS was conducted. Clinical variables, device settings, adverse events, and patient-reported outcomes were assessed at baseline, 3 and 6 months. Results: 65 participants were included, 58 completed 6 months of follow-up.Mean catheter wear time increased from 3.6 ± 1.1 to 6.1 ± 2.3 days,(p < 0.001), and reservoir change interval increased from 3.5 ± 1.0 to 5.2 ± 2.3 days,(p < 0.001). Glycemic control remained overall stable, although small changes were observed in some CGM metrics (Time in range-TIR: 80.0 ± 7.1% to 78.0 ± 10.0%, p = 0.014) and slight increases in time above range, while hypoglycemia exposure remained unchanged. HbA1c decreased from 6.8 ± 0.5% to 6.4 ± 1.0%, (p = 0.03). Total daily insulin dose did not change, but insulin use related to infusion set management decreased significantly. Pain at cannula insertion improved from 2.1 ± 1.5 to 1.2 ± 1.1,(p < 0.001), and treatment satisfaction increased from 8.2 ± 1.9 to 9.0 ± 1.2,(p = 0.012). No episodes of severe hypoglycemia or diabetic ketoacidosis occurred. Cannula wear duration was strongly correlated with reservoir change interval (r = 0.712, p < 0.001). At 6 months, 92.3% of participants continued using the E-iS, with 48.3% maintaining the full 7-day wear duration. Conclusions: In real-world use with an AID system, the E-iS significantly prolonged catheter wear duration and reservoir change intervals while remaining safe and well tolerated. It was associated with high satisfaction and stable glycemic outcomes, supporting E-iS as a practical strategy to reduce the burden of infusion set changes in routine clinical practice.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Battelino, T., Danne, T., Bergenstal, R. M., Amiel, S. A., Beck, R., Biester, T., Bosi, E., Buckingham, B. A., Cefalu, W. T., Close, K. L., et al. (2019) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dci19-0028 · Cited by 4,032 · see citing works
Early Detection of Infusion Set Failure During Insulin Pump Therapy in Type 1 Diabetes
Cescon, M., DeSalvo, D. J., Ly, T. T., Maahs, D. M., Messer, L. H., Buckingham, B. A., Doyle, F. J., & Dassau, E. (2016) · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · doi:10.1177/1932296816663962 · Cited by 51 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Catheter wear beyond day three has been associated with a higher risk of diabetic ketoacidosis, unexplained hyperglycemia, severe hypoglycemia, and other adverse events related to infusion set and catheter use [11].”
Brazg, R., Garg, S. K., Bhargava, A., Thrasher, J. R., Latif, K., Bode, B. W., Bailey, T. S., Horowitz, B. S., Cavale, A., Kudva, Y. C., et al. (2022) · Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/dia.2021.0540 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Nieto de la Marca, M. D. L. O., Fernández Velasco, P., Del Amo Simón, S., Sánchez Ibáñez, M., Collantes Matallana, A., Gómez Hoyos, E., Torres Torres, B., Ortolá Buigues, A., de Luis Román, D. A., & Díaz Soto, G.
- Venue
- Endocrine
- Published
- 2026-08-21
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 0969-711X (ISSN-L)
- 1559-0100
- PMC
- PMC13498480
- OpenAlex
- W7203894236
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Endocrine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Universidad de Valladolid
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Intravenous Infusion Technology and Safety
- Keywords
- type 1 diabetes, artificial pancreas, continuous glucose monitoring, MiniMed 780G, glycemic control, time in range, hypoglycemia, patient-reported outcomes, treatment satisfaction, insulin dose reduction, real-world evidence, device safety, adults with type 1 diabetes
- MeSH terms
- Patient Reported Outcome Measures, Glycemic Control, Continuous Glucose Monitoring, Adult, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hypoglycemia, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Insulin Infusion Systems, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review