Cited by 171Stroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryCancer survivorship and careNursing care and research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Preventing Chronic Emotional Distress in Stroke Survivors and Their Informal Caregivers

Open access

Abstract

Background/objective Chronic emotional distress (e.g., depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress) is common after stroke and interdependent between patients and their informal caregivers. We measured stroke survivors', caregivers', and neurocritical care nurses' views of primary drivers of distress during the stroke experience, and needs and preferences for the structure, topics, mode of delivery, and timing of an intervention to promote emotional recovery.Methods We conducted semi-structured interviews with 24 patient-caregiver dyads within the Neuroscience Intensive Care Unit (Neuro-ICU). Additionally, we conducted two focus groups with 15 nurses. Interviews and focus groups were audio-recorded, transcribed, and coded using NVivo 11 (QSR International) software.Results and conclusions The challenges and impacts of stroke most commonly reported by dyads were: uncertainty about future health, fear of recurrent strokes, negative emotions, and role changes post-stroke. Dyads and nurses agreed that resiliency skills such as mindfulness/focusing on the present, problem solving, gratitude/optimism, self-care, interpersonal communication and developing a supportive team of family, friends, and medical staff are beneficial to optimize recovery. The potential barrier to intervention delivery was accessibility, due to challenges of time and travel to appointments. Participants agreed that starting the intervention at hospitalization and continuing via live video after discharge is an ideal delivery modality. Stroke survivors, caregivers, and Neuro-ICU nurses believe that a resiliency skills-based intervention to prevent chronic emotional distress is necessary and urgent. This qualitative study provides valuable information on the challenges faced by dyads, intervention topics to prioritize, and strategies to maximize feasibility, acceptability, and effect.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12028-018-0641-6

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 37 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Bazely P, Jackson K, (eds) Qualitative data analysis with NVivo. 2nd ed. SAGE Publications Ltd; 2013

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 171

Metadata

Authors
McCurley, J. L., Funes, C. J., Zale, E. L., Lin, A., Jacobo, M., Jacobs, J. M., Salgueiro, D., Tehan, T., Rosand, J., & Vranceanu, A.-M.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Vranceanu, Ana-Maria
Venue
Neurocritical Care
Published
2018-11-12
Volume
30
Issue
3
Pages
581-589
ISSN
  • 1541-6933 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-0961
OpenAlex
W2901775239
Cited by
171
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 4
FWCI
5.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neurocritical Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • American Heart Association (228671)
  • Brain Aneurysm Foundation (229663)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing care and research
Keywords
stroke, depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress, informal caregivers, patient-caregiver dyads, resilience skills, mindfulness, self-care, emotional recovery
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Child, Depression, Female, Humans, Intensive Care Units, Male, Middle Aged, Nursing Staff, Hospital, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Stress, Psychological, Caregivers, Focus Groups, Survivors, Stroke, Qualitative Research, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review