Cited by 9Circadian rhythm and melatoninSleep and Wakefulness ResearchSleep and Work-Related Fatigue

Variations in Daily Expression of the Circadian Clock Protein, PER2, in the Rat Limbic Forebrain During Stable Entrainment to a Long Light Cycle

Harbour, Valerie L., Robinson, Barry, Amir, Shimon·2011·Journal of Molecular Neuroscience

Abstract

The circadian clock in the mammalian suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) can be entrained by light cycles longer than the normal 24-h light/dark (LD) cycle, but little is known about the effect of such cycles on circadian clocks outside the SCN. Here we examined the effect of exposure to a 26-h T cycle (T26, 1 h:25 h LD) on patterns of expression of the clock protein, PERIOD2 (PER2), in the SCN and in four regions of the limbic forebrain known to exhibit robust circadian oscillations in PER2: the oval nucleus of the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNSTov), central nucleus of the amygdala (CEA), basolateral amygdala (BLA), and dentate gyrus (DG). All rats showed stable entrainment of running wheel activity rhythms to the T26 cycle. As previously shown, PER2 expression in the SCN was stably entrained, peaking around the onset of locomotor activity. In contrast, exposure to the T26 cycle uncoupled the rhythms of PER2 expression in the BNSTov and CEA from that of the SCN, whereas PER2 rhythms in the BLA and DG were unaffected. These results show that exposure to long light cycles can uncouple circadian oscillators in select nuclei of the limbic forebrain from the SCN clock and suggest that such cycles may be used to study the functional consequences of coupling and uncoupling of brain circadian oscillators.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12031-010-9469-z

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Neural systems associated with affect, such as limbic brain regions, monoamine neurotransmitters, and the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, are all under circadian regulation.

    “Notably, neural systems associated with affect, such as the limbic brain regions, monoamine neurotransmitters, and the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis (HPA), are all under circadian regulation27–31.”

    From Circadian rhythm disruption and mental health (2020) · cites this paper as [28]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harbour, V. L., Robinson, B., & Amir, S.
Affiliations
Concordia University (CA)
Corresponding author
Amir, Shimon
Venue
Journal of Molecular Neuroscience
Published
2010-11-10
Volume
45
Issue
2
Pages
154-161
ISSN
  • 0895-8696 (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-1166
OpenAlex
W1973397362
Cited by
9
References
26
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Molecular Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Concordia University
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Keywords
circadian clock, Per2, suprachiasmatic nucleus, limbic forebrain, circadian entrainment, bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, central amygdala, basolateral amygdala, dentate gyrus, clock gene expression
MeSH terms
Amygdala, Animals, Circadian Rhythm, Male, Septal Nuclei, Suprachiasmatic Nucleus, Rats, Wistar, Photoperiod, Dentate Gyrus, Rats, Period Circadian Proteins, Circadian Clocks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review