Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 0Gene Regulatory Network AnalysisPhilosophy of Biology and Scientific ExplanationComplex Systems and Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Do cells use passwords in cell-state transitions? Is cell signaling sometimes encrypted?

Open access
Root, Alex·2020·Theory in Biosciences

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Organisms must maintain proper regulation including defense and healing. Life-threatening problems may be caused by pathogens or by a multicellular organism's own cells through cancer or autoimmune disorders. Life evolved solutions to these problems that can be conceptualized through the lens of information security, which is a well-developed field in computer science. Here I argue that taking an information security view of cells is not merely semantics, but useful to explain features of signaling, regulation, and defense. An information security perspective also offers a conduit for cross-fertilization of advanced ideas from computer science and the potential for biology to inform computer science. First, I consider whether cells use passwords, i.e., initiation sequences that are required for subsequent signals to have effects, by analyzing the concept of pioneer transcription factors in chromatin regulation and cellular reprogramming. Second, I consider whether cells may encrypt signal transduction cascades. Encryption could benefit cells by making it more difficult for pathogens or oncogenes to hijack cell networks. By using numerous molecules, cells may gain a security advantage in particular against viruses, whose genome sizes are typically under selection pressure. I provide a simple conceptual argument for how cells may perform encryption through posttranslational modifications, complex formation, and chromatin accessibility. I invoke information theory to provide a criterion of an entropy spike to assess whether a signaling cascade has encryption-like features. I discuss how the frequently invoked concept of context dependency may oversimplify more advanced features of cell signaling networks, such as encryption. Therefore, by considering that biochemical networks may be even more complex than commonly realized we may be better able to understand defenses against pathogens and pathologies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12064-019-00295-1

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Levy S (2010) Hackers. O’Reilly Media, Sebastopol

Metadata

Authors
Root, A.
Affiliations
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
Root, Alex
Venue
Theory in Biosciences
Published
2019-06-07
Volume
139
Issue
1
Pages
87-93
ISSN
  • 1431-7613 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-7530
OpenAlex
W2955923099
Cited by
0
References
61
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Theory in Biosciences (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute (P30 CA008748)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Systems and Dynamics
Keywords
signal transduction, encryption, cell state transitions, pioneer transcription factors, chromatin regulation, cellular reprogramming, signaling pathways, post-translational modification, chromatin accessibility, information theory, entropy (information theory), context sensitivity, antiviral defense
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Animals, Autoimmune Diseases, Biological Phenomena, Chromatin, Environment, Biological Evolution, Humans, Immune System, Models, Biological, Neoplasms, Neurons, Semantics, Signal Transduction, Genome, Entropy, Computational Biology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.