Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,026

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver consensus recommendations on hepatocellular carcinoma

Open access
Omata, Masao, Lesmana, Laurentius A., Tateishi, Ryosuke, Chen, Pei-Jer, Lin, Shi-Ming, Yoshida, Haruhiko, Kudo, Masatoshi, Lee, Jeong Min, Choi, Byung Ihn, Poon, Ronnie T. P., Shiina, Shuichiro, Cheng, Ann Lii, Jia, Ji-Dong, Obi, Shuntaro, Han, Kwang Hyub, Jafri, Wasim, Chow, Pierce, Lim, Seng Gee, Chawla, Yogesh K., Budihusodo, Unggul, Gani, Rino A., Lesmana, C. Rinaldi, Putranto, Terawan Agus, Liaw, Yun Fan, Sarin, Shiv Kumar·2010·Hepatology International

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL) convened an international working party on the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in December 2008 to develop consensus recommendations. METHODS: The working party consisted of expert hepatologist, hepatobiliary surgeon, radiologist, and oncologist from Asian-Pacific region, who were requested to make drafts prior to the consensus meeting held at Bali, Indonesia on 4 December 2008. The quality of existing evidence and strength of recommendations were ranked from 1 (highest) to 5 (lowest) and from A (strongest) to D (weakest), respectively, according to the Oxford system of evidence-based approach for developing the consensus statements. RESULTS: Participants of the consensus meeting assessed the quality of cited studies and assigned grades to the recommendation statements. Finalized recommendations were presented at the fourth APASL single topic conference on viral-related HCC at Bali, Indonesia and approved by the participants of the conference.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12072-010-9165-7

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 1,026

Metadata

Authors
Omata, M., Lesmana, L. A., Tateishi, R., Chen, P.-J., Lin, S.-M., Yoshida, H., Kudo, M., Lee, J. M., Choi, B. I., Poon, R. T. P., Shiina, S., Cheng, A. L., Jia, J.-D., Obi, S., Han, K. H., Jafri, W., Chow, P., Lim, S. G., Chawla, Y. K., Budihusodo, U., Gani, R. A., Lesmana, C. R., Putranto, T. A., Liaw, Y. F., & Sarin, S. K.
Venue
Hepatology International
Published
2010-03-18
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
439-474
ISSN
  • 1936-0533 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-0541
OpenAlex
W2047554241
Cited by
1,026
References
8
FWCI
29.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver consensus recommendations on hepatocellular carcinoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s12072-010-9165-7
The paper
Omata, M., Lesmana, L. A., Tateishi, R., Chen, P.-J., Lin, S.-M., Yoshida, H., Kudo, M., Lee, J. M., Choi, B. I., Poon, R. T. P., Shiina, S., Cheng, A. L., Jia, J.-D., Obi, S., Han, K. H., Jafri, W., Chow, P., Lim, S. G., Chawla, Y. K., . . . Sarin, S. K. (2010). Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver consensus recommendations on hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology International. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12072-010-9165-7

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.